Chimura Misato, Butt Jawad H, Matsumoto Shingo, McMurray Eoghan G M, Henderson Alasdair D, Talebi Atefeh, Desai Akshay S, Lefkowitz Martin P, Rizkala Adel R, Rouleau Jean L, Solomon Scott D, Swedberg Karl, Zile Michael R, Packer Milton, Jhund Pardeep S, McMurray John J V
British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre University of Glasgow UK.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Suita Japan.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 6;14(9):e038249. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.038249. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
Women with heart failure (HF) ejection fraction appeared to respond more favorably to sacubitril/valsartan, compared with valsartan, than men in PARAGON-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ARB Global Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction), driven by a greater reduction in total (first and recurrent) HF hospitalizations. Sex-specific efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in PARADIGM-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure) remain unreported.
This post hoc analysis of PARADIGM-HF examined sex-based outcomes in patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction randomized to sacubitril/valsartan or enalapril. The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization. Secondary and exploratory efficacy outcomes, biomarker changes, and safety outcomes were also assessed. Among 8399 participants, 1832 (21.8%) were women. Women were older, had worse New York Heart Association functional class and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores, more symptoms of HF, and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, yet had lower rates of HF hospitalization (and other worsening of HF) and cardiovascular death than men. Compared with enalapril, sacubitril/valsartan reduced the risk of the primary end point to a similar extent in both sexes: hazard ratios, 0.76 (95% CI, 0.62-0.94) in women and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.73-0.89) in men (-interaction=0.62). Results were consistent for the individual components of the primary outcome. The rate ratio for total HF hospitalizations was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.48-0.89) in women and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.69-0.94) in men (-interaction=0.25). Randomized treatment discontinuation and adverse effects of interest were similar in women and men.
In PARADIGM-HF, sacubitril/valsartan, compared with enalapril, reduced the risk of HF hospitalizations, death from cardiovascular causes, and death from any cause similarly in women and men with HF with reduced ejection fraction. In addition, sacubitril/valsartan was safe and well tolerated, irrespective of sex.
URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT01035255.
在PARAGON-HF(射血分数保留的心衰患者中ARNI与ARB全球结局的前瞻性比较)研究中,与缬沙坦相比,射血分数降低的心衰女性患者似乎对沙库巴曲缬沙坦的反应比对缬沙坦的反应更有利,这是由于(首次和再发)心衰住院总数的更大幅度降低所致。沙库巴曲缬沙坦在PARADIGM-HF(ARNI与ACEI对心衰全球死亡率和发病率影响的前瞻性比较)中的性别特异性疗效和安全性尚未见报道。
这项对PARADIGM-HF的事后分析研究了随机接受沙库巴曲缬沙坦或依那普利治疗的射血分数降低的心衰患者基于性别的结局。主要终点是心血管死亡或心衰住院的复合终点。还评估了次要和探索性疗效结局、生物标志物变化以及安全性结局。在8399名参与者中,1832名(21.8%)为女性。女性年龄更大,纽约心脏协会功能分级和堪萨斯城心肌病问卷评分更差,心衰症状更多,估计肾小球滤过率更低,但与男性相比,心衰住院率(以及其他心衰恶化情况)和心血管死亡率更低。与依那普利相比,沙库巴曲缬沙坦在两性中降低主要终点风险的程度相似:女性的风险比为0.76(95%CI,0.62-0.94),男性为0.80(95%CI,0.73-0.89)(交互作用P=0.62)。主要结局的各个组成部分结果一致。女性心衰住院总数的发生率比为0.66(95%CI,0.48-0.89),男性为0.80(95%CI,0.69-0.94)(交互作用P=0.25)。随机治疗中断情况和关注的不良反应在女性和男性中相似。
在PARADIGM-HF研究中,与依那普利相比,沙库巴曲缬沙坦在射血分数降低的心衰女性和男性中,降低心衰住院、心血管原因死亡和任何原因死亡风险的程度相似。此外,无论性别,沙库巴曲缬沙坦都是安全且耐受性良好的。