Chen Jui-Yi, Pan Heng-Chih, Wu Vin-Cent
Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.
Department of Health and Nutrition, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan, Taiwan.
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2025 Apr 23. doi: 10.1007/s10557-025-07698-x.
Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNi) have been shown to improve cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients. However, their impact on HF patients with concurrent acute kidney disease (AKD) remains underexplored. This study investigated the outcomes of ARNi compared to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) in HF patients with AKD.
The study included 20,009 hospitalized HF and AKD patients who underwent dialysis during hospitalization, recovered from dialysis within 90 days after discharge, and were followed until November 30, 2022, using data from TriNetX. The study period began in July 2015, coinciding with the availability of ARNi in the market. Propensity score matching (1:1) was applied to balance ARNi and ACEi groups. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to assess the risks of mortality, major adverse kidney events (MAKE), readmission and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). The follow-up period was conducted with a maximum duration of 5 years.
A total of 20,009 AKD patients (mean [SD] age, 59.1 [12.2] years) were enrolled, of whom 21.9% received ARNi, with a median follow-up of 2.3 years. After matching, 4391 patients (mean age, 58.6 years; male, 67.9%) were identified in both the ARNi and control groups. ARNi users exhibited a significantly lower risk of mortality (aHR, 0.32, 95% CI 0.13-0.80, p = 0.01), MAKE (aHR, 0.58, 95% CI 0.51-0.66, p < 0.01 ), and readmission (aHR, 0.61, 95% CI 0.55-0.68, p <0.01) versus controls. However, no significant difference in the risk of MACE was observed between the two groups (aHR, 0.94, 95% CI 0.82-1.09, p = 0.78). Subgroup analysis revealed ARNi users, when concomitantly treated with mineralocorticoids, diuretics, or beta-blockers had significantly lower risks of mortality, readmission, and MAKE than the control group. In addition, ARNi significantly reduced mortality and MAKE in patients with GFR 30-60 mL/min/1.73 m, irrespective of proteinuria status. However, no significant benefit was observed in patients with GFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m.
In HF patients with AKD, ARNi was associated with reduced all-cause mortality, MAKE, and readmission risks compared to ACEi, particularly with concurrent mineralocorticoids, diuretics, or beta-blockers. Future research is necessary to further investigate the impact of ARNi on outcomes in patients with HF and AKD.
血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂(ARNi)已被证明可改善心力衰竭(HF)患者的心血管结局。然而,它们对合并急性肾损伤(AKD)的HF患者的影响仍未得到充分研究。本研究调查了ARNi与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEi)相比,在合并AKD的HF患者中的结局。
该研究纳入了20009例住院的HF和AKD患者,这些患者在住院期间接受了透析治疗,出院后90天内从透析中恢复,并使用TriNetX的数据随访至2022年11月30日。研究期始于2015年7月,与ARNi在市场上的可用性一致。应用倾向评分匹配(1:1)来平衡ARNi组和ACEi组。计算调整后的风险比(aHR)及95%置信区间(CI),以评估死亡、主要不良肾脏事件(MAKE)、再入院和主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的风险。随访期最长为5年。
共纳入20009例AKD患者(平均[标准差]年龄为59.1[12.2]岁),其中21.9%接受了ARNi治疗,中位随访时间为2.3年。匹配后,ARNi组和对照组各有4391例患者(平均年龄58.6岁;男性占67.9%)。与对照组相比,使用ARNi的患者死亡风险(aHR,0.32,95%CI 0.13 - 0.80,p = 0.01)、MAKE风险(aHR, 0.58, 95%CI 0.51 - 0.66, p < 0.01)和再入院风险(aHR, 0.61, 95%CI 0.55 - 0.68, p < 0.01)显著更低。然而,两组之间MACE风险未观察到显著差异(aHR, 0.94, 95%CI 0.82 - 1.09, p = 0.78)。亚组分析显示,当ARNi使用者同时接受盐皮质激素、利尿剂或β受体阻滞剂治疗时,其死亡、再入院和MAKE风险显著低于对照组。此外,无论蛋白尿状态如何,ARNi均可显著降低估算肾小球滤过率(GFR)为30 - 60 mL/min/1.73 m²患者的死亡率和MAKE。然而,在GFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m²的患者中未观察到显著益处。
在合并AKD的HF患者中,与ACEi相比,ARNi与全因死亡率、MAKE和再入院风险降低相关,尤其是在同时使用盐皮质激素、利尿剂或β受体阻滞剂的情况下。未来有必要进一步研究ARNi对合并HF和AKD患者结局的影响。