Rodríguez-Espinosa Diana, Cuadrado-Payán Elena, Morantes Laura, Gomez Miquel, Maduell Francisco, Broseta José Jesús
Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Apr 10;12:1497353. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1497353. eCollection 2025.
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a significant cardiovascular (CV) risk factor, with dialysis-dependent CKD (DD-CKD) patients facing high mortality rates. Hypercholesterolemia is another crucial CV risk factor, typically managed with lipid-lowering therapy, though its efficacy in DD-CKD remains uncertain. Evidence shows mixed results regarding the benefits of statins in these patients. Citrate-based dialysates are known to reduce inflammatory biomarkers compared to acetate-based ones, potentially impacting lipid profiles and immune responses. This study aimed to determine the effects of citrate vs. acetate dialysate on lipid profiles and immunophenotypes in DD-CKD patients.
This unicentric, cross-over, prospective study included 21 hemodialysis patients (10 males, 11 females, average age 62.25 years). Each patient underwent 24 dialysis sessions (12 with each dialysate) and acted as their own control. Lipid profiles, immunological parameters, and nutritional and inflammatory markers were measured before the last session with each dialysate.
After twelve dialysis sessions with citrate dialysate (CD), compared to acetate dialysate (AD), there was a statistically significant decline in TG and remnant cholesterol, with a decrease in HDL and an increase in LDL. Regarding immunology, C3 complement levels were higher, while CD3+ CD8+ and CD16+ 56+ lymphocytes were lower. Finally, total lymphocytes were lower with AD than with CD. We found no difference in predialysis nutritional nor inflammatory parameters except for ESR, which was higher when subjects used CD than AD.
There are significant differences in lipid and immunophenotypic profiles with CD in comparison to AD. Interestingly, there could be an advantageous profile given the reduced amount of remnant cholesterol and TG. However, further studies are needed to understand if the observed changes lead to beneficial hard clinical outcomes in DD-CKD patients.
慢性肾脏病(CKD)是一个重要的心血管(CV)危险因素,依赖透析的慢性肾脏病(DD-CKD)患者面临着较高的死亡率。高胆固醇血症是另一个关键的心血管危险因素,通常采用降脂治疗,但其在DD-CKD中的疗效仍不确定。有证据表明,他汀类药物对这些患者的益处存在混合结果。已知与基于醋酸盐的透析液相比,基于柠檬酸盐的透析液可降低炎症生物标志物,可能会影响血脂谱和免疫反应。本研究旨在确定柠檬酸盐透析液与醋酸盐透析液对DD-CKD患者血脂谱和免疫表型的影响。
这项单中心、交叉、前瞻性研究纳入了21名血液透析患者(10名男性,11名女性,平均年龄62.25岁)。每位患者接受24次透析治疗(每种透析液各12次),并作为自身对照。在最后一次使用每种透析液治疗前,测量血脂谱、免疫参数以及营养和炎症标志物。
与醋酸盐透析液(AD)相比,使用柠檬酸盐透析液(CD)进行12次透析治疗后,甘油三酯(TG)和残留胆固醇有统计学意义的下降,高密度脂蛋白(HDL)降低,低密度脂蛋白(LDL)升高。在免疫学方面,C3补体水平较高,而CD3+CD8+和CD16+56+淋巴细胞较低。最后,AD组的总淋巴细胞低于CD组。除红细胞沉降率(ESR)外,透析前营养和炎症参数无差异,使用CD时ESR高于使用AD时。
与AD相比,CD在血脂和免疫表型方面存在显著差异。有趣的是,鉴于残留胆固醇和TG的量减少,可能存在有利的情况。然而,需要进一步研究以了解观察到的变化是否会给DD-CKD患者带来有益的硬性临床结局。