Gadour Eyad, Gardezi Syed A
Multi-organ Transplant Centre of Excellence, Liver Transplantation Unit, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam 32253, Saudi Arabia.
Internal Medicine, Zamzam University College, School of Medicine, Khartoum 11113, Sudan.
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Apr 27;17(4):103395. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.103395.
The management of portal hypertension and its complications, such as variceal bleeding, in patients with cirrhosis often involves the use of nonselective beta-blockers (NSBBs) and a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). Both treatment modalities have demonstrated efficacy; however, each presents distinct challenges and benefits. NSBBs, including propranolol, nadolol, and carvedilol, effectively reduce portal pressure, but are associated with side effects such as bradycardia, hypotension, fatigue, and respiratory issues. Additionally, NSBBs can exacerbate conditions such as refractory ascites, hepatorenal syndrome, and hepatic encephalopathy. In contrast, TIPS effectively reduces the incidence of variceal rebleeding, controlling refractory ascites. However, it is associated with a significant risk of hepatic encephalopathy, shunt dysfunction, and procedure-related complications including bleeding and infection. The high cost of TIPS, along with the need for regular follow-up and potential re-intervention, poses additional challenges. Furthermore, patient selection for TIPS is critical, as inappropriate candidates may experience suboptimal outcomes. Future studies comparing NSBBs and TIPS should focus on refining the patient selection criteria, enhancing procedural techniques, optimising combination therapies, and conducting long-term outcome studies. Personalised treatment approaches, cost-effectiveness analyses, and improved patient education and support are essential for maximising the use of these therapies.
肝硬化患者门静脉高压及其并发症(如静脉曲张出血)的管理通常涉及使用非选择性β受体阻滞剂(NSBBs)和经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)。两种治疗方式均已证明有效;然而,每种方式都有独特的挑战和益处。NSBBs,包括普萘洛尔、纳多洛尔和卡维地洛,可有效降低门静脉压力,但会伴有心动过缓、低血压、疲劳和呼吸问题等副作用。此外,NSBBs会加重难治性腹水、肝肾综合征和肝性脑病等病症。相比之下,TIPS可有效降低静脉曲张再出血的发生率,控制难治性腹水。然而,它与肝性脑病、分流功能障碍以及包括出血和感染在内的手术相关并发症的显著风险相关。TIPS的高昂成本,以及定期随访和潜在再次干预的需求,带来了额外的挑战。此外,TIPS的患者选择至关重要,因为不合适的候选人可能会有不理想的结果。未来比较NSBBs和TIPS的研究应侧重于完善患者选择标准、改进手术技术、优化联合治疗以及开展长期结局研究。个性化治疗方法、成本效益分析以及改善患者教育和支持对于最大限度地利用这些疗法至关重要。