Chai K S, Faisham W I, Wan-Sulaiman W A, Rosli M A, Mat-Saad A Z, Jusoh M H, Paiman M, Halim A S
Reconstructive Sciences Unit, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Malaysia.
Department of Orthopaedics, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Malaysia.
Malays Orthop J. 2025 Mar;19(1):57-65. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.2503.008.
There is no consensus yet whether delayed limb salvage procedures with an "ischemic time" of more than 6 hours are worthwhile, as these repairs are often complicated by reperfusion injury. Our study aims to determine the outcomes of delayed revascularization to validate our current treatment approach and assess areas for future improvement.
We performed a retrospective cohort study on a highly selected group of patients who underwent delayed revascularization surgery for lower extremity traumatic vascular injuries in our institution from January 2008 to June 2018. Exclusion criteria include the presence of a terminal non-salvageable ischemic limb; defined as a gangrenous extremity evident by non-blanchable, mottled skin with complete limb paralysis, renal trauma, known renal impairment, and those with an ischemic time less than 6 hours. The demographic data, type and level of vascular, type of injuries, duration of ischemia, MESS score, and the need for secondary amputation were assessed. Fifty-nine patients were identified and included in the analysis. Fifty patients (84.7%) were male, while 9 patients (15.3%) were female. The mean age was 28.1 years. The most injured vessel was the popliteal artery (n=41, 69.5%). The commonest injury pattern was contusion with thrombosis (n=31, 52.5%). Revascularizations were mainly achieved by interposition saphenous vein graft (n=40, 67.8%). The mean duration of delayed was 14.1 hours. A total of 83.1% of patients (n=49) had a Mangled Extremity Severity Scoring (MESS) of 7 and above. The limb salvage rate in this study was 89.8%, with only 6 patients (12.2%) requiring secondary amputations. Thirty-one patients developed rhabdomyolysis, with 6 cases (19.4%) requiring temporary inpatient renal replacement therapy (RRT). Out of the six, only one patient required lifelong RRT.
Limb salvage in those with the duration of delayed of more than 6 hours should be attempted after careful assessment and a high rate of limb salvage, minimal renal complication and acceptable functional (mobility) outcomes can be achieved, despite the reperfusion injury that accompanies.
对于“缺血时间”超过6小时的延迟肢体挽救手术是否值得,目前尚无共识,因为这些修复手术常因再灌注损伤而变得复杂。我们的研究旨在确定延迟血运重建的结果,以验证我们目前的治疗方法,并评估未来可改进的领域。
我们对2008年1月至2018年6月在我院因下肢创伤性血管损伤接受延迟血运重建手术的一组高度精选的患者进行了回顾性队列研究。排除标准包括存在终末期不可挽救的缺血肢体;定义为肢体出现不可压白、斑驳的皮肤,伴有完全肢体麻痹、坏疽,肾创伤、已知肾功能损害以及缺血时间少于6小时的患者。评估了人口统计学数据、血管类型和水平、损伤类型、缺血持续时间、MESS评分以及二次截肢的必要性。确定并纳入59例患者进行分析。50例(84.7%)为男性,9例(15.3%)为女性。平均年龄为28.1岁。受损最严重的血管是腘动脉(n = 41,69.5%)。最常见的损伤模式是挫伤伴血栓形成(n = 31,52.5%)。血运重建主要通过大隐静脉移植术实现(n = 40,67.8%)。延迟的平均持续时间为14.1小时。共有83.1%的患者(n = 49)Mangled肢体严重程度评分(MESS)为7分及以上。本研究中的肢体挽救率为89.8%,只有6例患者(12.2%)需要二次截肢。31例患者发生横纹肌溶解,其中6例(19.4%)需要临时住院进行肾脏替代治疗(RRT)。在这6例患者中,只有1例患者需要终身RRT。
对于延迟时间超过6小时的患者,尽管存在伴随的再灌注损伤,但在仔细评估后仍应尝试进行肢体挽救,并且可以实现较高的肢体挽救率、最小的肾脏并发症和可接受的功能(活动能力)结果。