Ushiku Chikara, Ikegami Taku, Saito Shinji, Wakiya Hiroki, Kanai Tomoaki, Sawada Naomu, Saito Mitsuru
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Global Spine J. 2025 Apr 28:21925682251339109. doi: 10.1177/21925682251339109.
Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectivesTo determine the ideal cage placement position in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgery to prevent vertebral endplate cyst (VEC) formation and improve bone union rates.MethodsThis study retrospectively analyzed 69 patients who underwent TLIF, and 88 intervertebral levels were observed. Patients were categorized into peripheral, central, and mixed types based on the cage placement. The incidence of VEC formation and endplate injuries (EIs) were assessed using computed tomography 1 year postoperatively. Factors associated with VEC formation and non-union, including patient demographics, clinical data, cage placement, Hounsfield unit values, and intraoperative EIs, were analyzed.ResultsVECs occurred in 55.7% of surgical levels and were significantly associated with non-union ( < .001). Center-type cage placement was a strong predictor of VEC formation ( = .028, OR = 16.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36-195.0), along with EIs ( = .003, OR = 5.86, 95% CI: 1.80-19.0). In contrast, pre-existing VECs appeared to have a protective effect ( = .046, OR = 0.272, 95% CI: 0.076-0.979).ConclusionsCage placement in the central region significantly increases the risk of VEC formation and non-union. Periphery-type placement may be preferable to reduce endplate damage and improve fusion outcomes. Preventing EIs and optimizing cage positioning are critical to minimize VEC formation. Further prospective studies are needed to refine surgical strategies and improve long-term outcomes following TLIF.
研究设计
回顾性队列研究。
目的
确定经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)中理想的椎间融合器放置位置,以预防椎体终板囊肿(VEC)形成并提高骨融合率。
方法
本研究回顾性分析了69例行TLIF手术的患者,共观察88个椎间隙。根据椎间融合器的放置位置将患者分为外周型、中央型和混合型。术后1年使用计算机断层扫描评估VEC形成和终板损伤(EI)的发生率。分析与VEC形成和不融合相关的因素,包括患者人口统计学特征、临床数据、椎间融合器放置位置、亨氏单位值和术中EI。
结果
55.7%的手术节段出现VEC,且与不融合显著相关(P<0.001)。中央型椎间融合器放置是VEC形成的有力预测因素(P = 0.028,OR = 16.3,95%置信区间[CI]:1.36 - 195.0),与EI也相关(P = 0.003,OR = 5.86,95% CI:1.80 - 19.0)。相比之下,术前存在的VEC似乎具有保护作用(P = 0.046,OR = 0.272,95% CI:0.076 - 0.979)。
结论
中央区域放置椎间融合器会显著增加VEC形成和不融合的风险。外周型放置可能更有利于减少终板损伤并改善融合效果。预防EI和优化椎间融合器定位对于减少VEC形成至关重要。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来完善手术策略并改善TLIF后的长期疗效。