Cox Melanna, Richmond Paige F, Shtino Annie, Sirard John R
University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2025 Mar 17;6(1):249-262. doi: 10.1089/whr.2024.0117. eCollection 2025.
Physical behaviors (PBs), defined as physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB), are consistently less favorable in women than men. Extensive qualitative research has identified gender norms as a well-known barrier to women's PA, but they have yet to be clearly conceptualized and quantified. The purpose of this study was to (1) investigate the relationship between benevolent sexism endorsement (BSE) and PB, (2) explore women's experiences with sexism in PA settings, and (3) identify sexism constructs within focus group discussions.
Participants completed the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (0-5 scale) and wore a hip-worn activity monitor for 7 days. Spearman correlations were calculated between BSE and PB. A 90-minute focus group ( = 4) was transcribed and coded to identify themes and sexism constructs.
Participants ( = 20, 20.7 ± 1.3 years) exceeded PA guidelines and reported low BSE scores (1.8 ± 0.76). Weak associations were found between BSE and objectively measured PA ( = -0.19 to = -0.37) and ST ( = 0.14). Focus group results yielded four themes: (1) Age-Related Decline in PA, (2) Parental Roles, (3) Peer Relationships/Friendships, and (4) Physical Education Teachers/Coaches.
As hypothesized, associations between BSE and PA outcomes and SB were negative and positive, respectively. Focus group themes were related to benevolent sexism constructs. Future research should be conducted in larger, more diverse samples and consider other factors that may impact one's endorsement of benevolent sexism.
身体行为(PBs),定义为身体活动(PA)和久坐行为(SB),在女性中一直不如男性有利。广泛的定性研究已将性别规范确定为女性参与身体活动的一个众所周知的障碍,但它们尚未得到清晰的概念化和量化。本研究的目的是:(1)调查善意性别歧视认同(BSE)与身体行为之间的关系;(2)探索女性在身体活动环境中遭遇性别歧视的经历;(3)在焦点小组讨论中识别性别歧视的构成要素。
参与者完成了矛盾性别歧视量表(0 - 5分制),并佩戴髋部活动监测器7天。计算BSE与身体行为之间的斯皮尔曼相关性。对一个90分钟的焦点小组(n = 4)进行转录和编码,以识别主题和性别歧视的构成要素。
参与者(n = 20,年龄20.7 ± 1.3岁)达到了身体活动指南要求,且报告的BSE得分较低(1.8 ± 0.76)。在BSE与客观测量的身体活动(r = -0.19至r = -0.37)和久坐行为(r = 0.14)之间发现了微弱的关联。焦点小组的结果产生了四个主题:(1)身体活动与年龄相关的下降;(2)父母角色;(3)同伴关系/友谊;(4)体育教师/教练。
如假设的那样,BSE与身体活动结果和久坐行为之间的关联分别为负向和正向。焦点小组的主题与善意性别歧视的构成要素相关。未来的研究应在更大、更多样化的样本中进行,并考虑可能影响一个人对善意性别歧视认同的其他因素。