Sorato Mende Mensa
Department of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences Arba Minch University Arba Minch Ethiopia.
Department of Pharmacy, School of Medicine Komar University of Science and Technology Sulaymaniyah Iraq.
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 29;8(5):e70775. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70775. eCollection 2025 May.
Over one-quarter of the global population has no access to essential medicines. Improving access to medicines for chronic illness requires multi-level interventions. Nearly half of the people who need insulin cannot afford it.
To describe institution-specific interventions that can be applied to improve access to high-cost medicines used for chronic diseases without affecting revenue generated from pharmaceuticals.
A narrative review was conducted by using articles written in the English language from January 2000 to May 2020 and retrieved from PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar with the following systematic search query.
Fifty-three studies were included. Most of the drugs used for the treatment of hypertension, diabetes, chronic asthma, and cancer are not available in adequate quantity. It requires more than 4 months' wage for a lowest-paid worker to buy one cycle of treatment for non-Hodgkin lymphoma, cervical cancer, or breast cancer in Ethiopia. The replenish revenue by low-cost medicines (RRLCM) model theoretically improved access to high-cost medicines. This model's steps include: (1) Estimate the number of patients who will take high-cost medicine for specific chronic diseases. (2) Estimate the amount of high-cost medicine required in a given period. (3) Calculate the markup-related change in revenue. (4) Select fast-moving items with better affordability in the supply chain. (5) Estimate revenue by modifying the markup of fast-moving items with better public affordability, and (6) calculate the difference and compare the markup-related revenue resulting from adjusting markups.
Medicines used for chronic diseases are neither available nor affordable. The RRLCM model has potential to improve affordability, pending empirical validation. Therefore, it is important to reform national drug policy in light of pricing and markup regulation system. Researchers, who are willing to work in the similar area should evaluate the applicability of RRLCM model in different set-ups.
全球超过四分之一的人口无法获得基本药物。改善慢性病药物的可及性需要多层次干预措施。近一半需要胰岛素的人买不起。
描述可用于改善慢性病高成本药物可及性且不影响药品收入的机构特定干预措施。
通过使用2000年1月至2020年5月以英文撰写并从PubMed/Medline、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、Scopus、科学网和谷歌学术搜索中检索到的文章进行叙述性综述,使用以下系统搜索查询。
纳入了53项研究。用于治疗高血压、糖尿病、慢性哮喘和癌症的大多数药物供应不足。在埃塞俄比亚,一名低薪工人需要花费超过4个月的工资才能购买一个疗程的非霍奇金淋巴瘤、宫颈癌或乳腺癌治疗药物。低成本药品补充收入(RRLCM)模型理论上改善了高成本药品的可及性。该模型的步骤包括:(1)估计将使用特定慢性病高成本药物的患者数量。(2)估计给定时期所需的高成本药物数量。(3)计算与加价相关的收入变化。(4)在供应链中选择可负担性更好的畅销产品。(5)通过修改具有更好公众可负担性的畅销产品的加价来估计收入,以及(6)计算差异并比较调整加价后与加价相关的收入。
用于慢性病的药物既不可得也难以负担。RRLCM模型有潜力提高可负担性,但有待实证验证。因此,根据定价和加价监管系统改革国家药物政策很重要。愿意在类似领域工作的研究人员应评估RRLCM模型在不同环境中的适用性。