Suppr超能文献

耳道灌洗治疗非侵袭性耳真菌病:一项随机对照试验。

Ear-canal lavage for curing noninvasive otomycosis: A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Zhang Jia, Du Yusheng, Tang Lihua, Song Fan, Wang Guoliang, Mei Xingyu, Hou Lili, Cui Zelin, Zhu Zhenghua

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Shanghai General Hospital Jiuquan Hospital, Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 100#, Haining Road, Shanghai, 200080, China.

Department of Microbiology, Shanghai General Hospital Jiuquan Hospital, Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 100#, Haining Road, Shanghai City, 200080, China.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Sep;282(9):4645-4652. doi: 10.1007/s00405-025-09418-5. Epub 2025 May 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Fungal infection of the external auditory canal, otomycosis, is generally a superficial, but sometimes stubborn mycotic infection that rarely involves the middle ear. We designed a randomized, controlled cohort study to analyse the treatment effect of ear canal lavage on otomycosis.

METHODS

The clinical patients were divided into two groups: an irrigation group and an irrigation + local drug treatment control group. The patients were followed up once a month for three months.

RESULTS

From January 2022 to December 2023, a total of 102 patients treated for otomycosis were enrolled, and 98 of the patients were followed up for three months. 22 of the 98 patients (22.45%) had no or minor symptoms. Common symptoms such as pruritus, pain, hearing impairment, etc., presented solely or in combination. Our fungal culture results revealed that, in 83 patients (84.69%), the otomycotic pathogen was Aspergillus, in 3 patients (3.06%) it was Penicillium, in 2 patients (2.04%) it was Candida species, and in the remaining 13 patients (13.27%) it was negative. There were 3 patients (3.06%) with a mixture of fungal culture reports. In the lavage group, 48 (48/52, 92.30%) patients were cured with initial treatment after three months of follow-up, two (2/52, 3.85%) patients were cured after one month but were lost to follow-up after three months, and two (2/52, 3.85%) patients failed after initial treatment, received topical miconazole ointment treatment and were eventually cured. In the irrigation + local drug control group, 48 (48/50, 96.00%) subjects responded to initial treatment without recurrent disease after three months; 2 (2/50, 4.00%) subjects were lost to follow-up. According to Fisher's exact test, there was no significant difference in treatment efficiency between the two groups (P = 0.258).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that the diagnosis of otomycosis requires vigilance from clinicians given its nonspecific or minor symptoms. Both ear canal rinses and local antifungal creams are effective, and sequential treatment via both methods is reasonable.

摘要

目的

外耳道真菌感染,即耳霉菌病,通常是一种浅表性但有时较为顽固的霉菌感染,很少累及中耳。我们设计了一项随机对照队列研究,以分析耳道灌洗治疗耳霉菌病的效果。

方法

将临床患者分为两组:灌洗组和灌洗+局部药物治疗对照组。患者每月随访一次,共随访三个月。

结果

2022年1月至2023年12月,共纳入102例接受耳霉菌病治疗的患者,其中98例患者进行了三个月的随访。98例患者中,22例(22.45%)无或仅有轻微症状。瘙痒、疼痛、听力减退等常见症状单独或合并出现。真菌培养结果显示,83例患者(84.69%)的耳霉菌病原体为曲霉菌,3例(3.06%)为青霉菌,2例(2.04%)为念珠菌属,其余13例(13.27%)为阴性。有3例患者(3.06%)的真菌培养报告为混合感染。灌洗组中,48例(48/52,92.30%)患者在随访三个月后初始治疗即治愈,2例(2/52,3.85%)患者在一个月后治愈,但在三个月后失访,2例(2/52,3.85%)患者初始治疗失败,接受局部咪康唑软膏治疗后最终治愈。灌洗+局部药物对照组中,48例(48/50,96.00%)受试者初始治疗有效,三个月后无疾病复发;2例(2/50,4.00%)受试者失访。根据Fisher精确检验,两组治疗有效率无显著差异(P=0.258)。

结论

本研究表明,鉴于耳霉菌病症状不具特异性或较为轻微,临床医生诊断时需保持警惕。耳道冲洗和局部抗真菌乳膏均有效,两种方法序贯治疗是合理的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验