Gilmore Robert, Fernandes Richard, Schildkraut Tamar, Joshi Riddhi, Lin Lyman, Vorgin Sara, Etchegaray Amirah, Shanmuga Anandan Aathavan, Tambakis George, Loebenstein Moshe, An Yoon-Kyo, Begun Jakob, Wright Emily K
Department of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Gastroenterology, Mater Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Crohns Colitis 360. 2025 Apr 9;7(2):otaf028. doi: 10.1093/crocol/otaf028. eCollection 2025 Apr.
Antitumor necrosis factor (TNF) dose escalation is performed to improve therapeutic response and optimize outcomes in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). We aimed to describe the durability of anti-TNF therapy in patients with CD receiving escalated anti-TNF therapy, along with the overall durability of anti-TNF treatment between patients managed with a proactive versus reactive therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) approach.
We undertook a retrospective multicentre cohort study. One center practiced proactive TDM with a weekly virtual TDM clinic, while the other practiced reactive TDM. Patients receiving escalated infliximab or adalimumab therapy for CD from January 2015 to April 2022 were included. Durability was defined as the time from biologic start to cessation for treatment failure.
About 239 patients (45% female, median age 39) meeting criteria for inclusion were identified. About 165 patients were included in the proactive TDM cohort and 74 in the reactive TDM cohort.Anti-TNF naïve patients had significantly higher durability of therapy when compared with the anti-TNF exposed patients for both overall durability ( = .045) and durability postescalation ( = .017). The proactive TDM cohort had significantly higher durability when compared with the reactive cohort for both overall durability ( = .001) and durability postescalation ( = .002).
This multicentre, retrospective cohort study illustrates the importance of dose escalation as a therapeutic strategy in IBD care. The durability of anti-TNF therapy is superior in anti-TNF naïve compared to exposed patients and can be improved further by proactive TDM to guide dose optimization.
进行抗肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)剂量递增是为了改善克罗恩病(CD)患者的治疗反应并优化治疗结果。我们旨在描述接受递增抗TNF治疗的CD患者中抗TNF治疗的持久性,以及采用主动与被动治疗药物监测(TDM)方法管理的患者之间抗TNF治疗的总体持久性。
我们进行了一项回顾性多中心队列研究。一个中心通过每周的虚拟TDM诊所实施主动TDM,而另一个中心实施被动TDM。纳入了2015年1月至2022年4月接受递增英夫利昔单抗或阿达木单抗治疗CD的患者。持久性定义为从生物制剂开始使用到因治疗失败而停药的时间。
确定了约239名符合纳入标准的患者(45%为女性,中位年龄39岁)。主动TDM队列纳入了约165名患者,被动TDM队列纳入了74名患者。对于总体持久性(P = 0.045)和递增后持久性(P = 0.017),初治抗TNF患者与曾接受抗TNF治疗的患者相比,治疗持久性显著更高。对于总体持久性(P = 0.001)和递增后持久性(P = 0.002),主动TDM队列与被动队列相比,持久性显著更高。
这项多中心回顾性队列研究说明了剂量递增作为炎症性肠病护理中一种治疗策略的重要性。与曾接受抗TNF治疗的患者相比,初治抗TNF患者的抗TNF治疗持久性更高,并可通过主动TDM进一步改善以指导剂量优化。