Virtanen Lari S, Olkkonen Maria, Saarela Toni P
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
J Vis. 2025 May 1;25(6):4. doi: 10.1167/jov.25.6.4.
To provide a stable percept of the surface color of objects, the visual system needs to account for variation in illumination chromaticity. This ability is called color constancy. The details of how the visual system disambiguates effects of illumination and reflectance on the light reaching the eye are still unclear. Here we asked how independent illumination and reflectance judgments are of each other, whether color constancy depends on explicitly identifying the illumination chromaticity, and what kinds of contextual cues support this identification. We studied the simultaneous identification of illumination and reflectance changes with realistically rendered, abstract three-dimensional scenes. Observers were tasked to identify both of these changes between sequentially presented stimuli. The stimuli included a central object whose reflectance could vary and a background that only varied due to changes in illumination chromaticity. We manipulated the visual cues available in the background: local contrast and specular highlights. We found that identification of illumination and reflectance changes was not independent: While reflectance changes were rarely misidentified as illumination changes, illumination changes clearly biased reflectance judgments. However, correct identification of reflectance changes was also not fully dependent on correctly identifying the illumination change: Only when there was no illumination change in the stimulus did it lead to better color constancy, that is, correctly identifying the reflectance change. Discriminability of illumination changes did not vary based on available visual cues of local contrast or specular highlights. Yet discriminability of reflectance changes was improved with local contrast and, to a lesser extent, with specular highlights, in the stimulus. We conclude that a failure of color constancy does not depend on a failure to identify illumination changes, but additional visual cues still improve color constancy through better disambiguation of illumination and reflectance changes.
为了提供对物体表面颜色的稳定感知,视觉系统需要考虑照明色度的变化。这种能力被称为颜色恒常性。视觉系统如何区分照明和反射对到达眼睛的光的影响的细节仍不清楚。在这里,我们研究了照明和反射判断彼此之间的独立性,颜色恒常性是否依赖于明确识别照明色度,以及哪些类型的上下文线索支持这种识别。我们使用逼真渲染的抽象三维场景研究了照明和反射变化的同时识别。观察者的任务是识别顺序呈现的刺激之间的这两种变化。刺激包括一个反射率可能变化的中心物体和一个仅因照明色度变化而变化的背景。我们操纵了背景中可用的视觉线索:局部对比度和镜面高光。我们发现照明和反射变化的识别不是独立的:虽然反射率变化很少被误识别为照明变化,但照明变化明显影响反射判断。然而,反射率变化的正确识别也不完全依赖于正确识别照明变化:只有当刺激中没有照明变化时,才会导致更好的颜色恒常性,即正确识别反射率变化。照明变化的可辨别性不会因局部对比度或镜面高光的可用视觉线索而变化。然而,刺激中的局部对比度以及在较小程度上的镜面高光提高了反射率变化的可辨别性。我们得出结论,颜色恒常性的失败并不取决于未能识别照明变化,但额外的视觉线索仍然通过更好地区分照明和反射变化来提高颜色恒常性。