Luo Xue, Fang Leqin, Du Shixu, Zeng Shufei, Zheng Shuqiong, Zhang Bin
Department of Psychiatry, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, No. 1838 North Guangzhou Avenue, Guangzhou, 510515, China.
Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Center for Brain Science and Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Guangzhou, China.
BMC Psychol. 2025 May 10;13(1):496. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02826-6.
The aim of this study was to utilize network analysis to explore the interconnections among anxiety, depressive, and insomnia symptoms in depressed patients in China.
The study included two surveys, the baseline survey was conducted from May 18, 2020 to June 18, 2020, and the follow-up survey was conducted 5 months later. A total of 4476 patients completed the baseline survey, and 1877 of them completed the follow-up survey. Depression symptoms were evaluated using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), anxiety symptoms were evaluated using the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7), and insomnia symptoms were evaluated using the 7-item Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). The centrality indices are utilized in the network analysis, and using Network Comparison Test (NCT) to evaluate the differences between the network structures at two different time points.
Network analysis revealed that the central symptom value was ISI5 ("Interfere with your daily functioning") in the baseline networks and ISI4 ("Worried/distressed") in the follow-up networks, the symptom with the bridge symptom value in both networks was PHQ9-3 ("Sleep"). The NCT results revealed no significant differences in edge weights and global strength among participants who completed both baseline and follow-up surveys.
Our results suggest that central symptom (e.g., "Interfere with your daily functioning","Worried/distressed") and bridge symptom PHQ9-3 ("Sleep") can be prioritized as a target for intervention and treatment in patients with depression.
本研究旨在利用网络分析探索中国抑郁症患者焦虑、抑郁和失眠症状之间的相互联系。
该研究包括两项调查,基线调查于2020年5月18日至2020年6月18日进行,随访调查在5个月后进行。共有4476名患者完成了基线调查,其中1877名完成了随访调查。使用9项患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)评估抑郁症状,使用7项广泛性焦虑障碍量表(GAD-7)评估焦虑症状,使用7项失眠严重程度指数(ISI)评估失眠症状。在网络分析中使用中心性指标,并使用网络比较测试(NCT)评估两个不同时间点网络结构之间的差异。
网络分析显示,基线网络中的中心症状值为ISI5(“干扰你的日常功能”),随访网络中的中心症状值为ISI4(“担心/苦恼”),两个网络中具有桥梁症状值的症状均为PHQ9-3(“睡眠”)。NCT结果显示,完成基线和随访调查的参与者在边权重和全局强度方面没有显著差异。
我们的结果表明,中心症状(如“干扰你的日常功能”、“担心/苦恼”)和桥梁症状PHQ9-3(“睡眠”)可作为抑郁症患者干预和治疗的优先目标。