Zhao Yuqing, Cai Jiayu, Song Jian, Shi Haoran, Kong Weicheng, Li Xinlei, Wei Wei, Xue Xiehua
The Affiliated Rehabilitation Hospital, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
College of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
Front Neurosci. 2025 Apr 29;19:1575815. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1575815. eCollection 2025.
Cognitive impairment substantially impacts quality of life in Parkinson's disease (PD), yet current biomarker frameworks lack sensitivity for detecting early-stage cognitive decline. While peak alpha frequency (PAF) and alpha power spectral density (PSD) have emerged as potential electrophysiological markers, prior studies primarily focused on global cortical measures, neglecting region-specific variations that may better reflect the heterogeneous nature of PD-related cognitive impairment (PDCOG). To address this gap, we conducted the first multiregional comparative analysis of PAF and alpha PSD between PDCOG and PD with normal cognition patients (PDNC).
Data from 76 participants (44 PD, 32 healthy controls) at The Affiliated Rehabilitation Hospital of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (March-July 2024) were analyzed. PAF and alpha PSD were computed across brain regions; cognitive function was assessed via MoCA.
Global PAF was reduced in PD vs. controls ( < 0.05) and correlated with cognition. PDCOG showed lower alpha PSD in parieto-occipital/posterior temporal regions (P3, P4, O1, T5, T6, PZ) vs. PDNC ( < 0.05), with these regions positively correlating with MoCA scores. ROC analysis identified P3, PZ, and T6 alpha PSD as optimal discriminators (AUC: 0.77-0.758). Executive function inversely correlated with alpha PSD in right posterior temporal/left occipital regions.
PAF differentiates PD from controls and links to global cognition, while regional alpha PSD (notably P3, PZ, T6) effectively distinguishes PDCOG from PDNC. These findings underscore regional QEEG's utility in PD cognitive assessment, though sensitivity limitations warrant optimization.
认知障碍对帕金森病(PD)患者的生活质量有重大影响,但目前的生物标志物框架在检测早期认知衰退方面缺乏敏感性。虽然峰值阿尔法频率(PAF)和阿尔法功率谱密度(PSD)已成为潜在的电生理标志物,但先前的研究主要集中在全脑皮质测量上,忽略了可能更好地反映PD相关认知障碍(PDCOG)异质性的区域特异性变化。为了填补这一空白,我们首次对PDCOG患者和认知正常的PD患者(PDNC)之间的PAF和阿尔法PSD进行了多区域比较分析。
分析了福建中医药大学附属康复医院2024年3月至7月76名参与者(44名PD患者,32名健康对照)的数据。计算了全脑各区域的PAF和阿尔法PSD;通过蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)评估认知功能。
与对照组相比,PD患者的全脑PAF降低(<0.05),且与认知相关。与PDNC患者相比,PDCOG患者在顶枕/颞后区域(P3、P4、O1、T5、T6、PZ)的阿尔法PSD较低(<0.05),这些区域与MoCA评分呈正相关。ROC分析确定P3、PZ和T6的阿尔法PSD为最佳鉴别指标(AUC:0.77 - 0.758)。执行功能与右颞后/左枕叶区域的阿尔法PSD呈负相关。
PAF可将PD与对照组区分开来,并与整体认知相关,而区域阿尔法PSD(特别是P3、PZ、T6)能有效区分PDCOG和PDNC。这些发现强调了区域脑电地形图在PD认知评估中的作用,尽管敏感性限制仍需优化。