Gupta Keshav Kumar, Simons Anthony, Mortimore Sean, Walker David, Sahota Raguwinder Bindy, De Mriganka, Arora Asit, Garas George
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Steelhouse Lane, Birmingham, B4 6TH, UK.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
J Robot Surg. 2025 May 15;19(1):217. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02389-z.
Consenting patients for surgery is a vital process with ethical and legal implications. The use of a standardised consent form may provide a solution to issues related to poor communication surrounding the consenting process. To date, there is no standardised consent form available for use specifically for transoral robotic surgery (TORS) across robotic centres. In an attempt to improve the consenting process relating specifically to TORS, this study aims to develop a standardised consent form using a modified Delphi process. A modified Delphi process was employed to define consensus for complications to be used in a standardised consent form for TORS. An initial iteration was devised using a literature search with experts rating each item using a Likert scale. The process was repeated until consensus was reached for all items. Two rounds were completed with seven experts detailing key risks to be included on a standardised TORS consent form. This study is the first to propose a standardised consent form for use specifically in TORS. The authors agree with other literature that suggests that the use of standardised consent forms provide numerous advantages over handwritten forms. Future studies are needed to evaluate its implementation across multiple centres in order to assess the proposed benefits to both clinicians and patients.
让患者同意接受手术是一个具有伦理和法律意义的重要过程。使用标准化的同意书可能为解决与同意过程中沟通不畅相关的问题提供一个解决方案。迄今为止,尚无专门供机器人手术中心用于经口机器人手术(TORS)的标准化同意书。为了改进专门针对TORS的同意过程,本研究旨在使用改良的德尔菲法制定一份标准化同意书。采用改良的德尔菲法来确定用于TORS标准化同意书中并发症的共识。最初的一轮是通过文献检索设计的,专家们使用李克特量表对每个项目进行评分。该过程重复进行,直到所有项目达成共识。两轮都已完成,七位专家详细说明了标准化TORS同意书中应包含的关键风险。本研究首次提出专门用于TORS的标准化同意书。作者同意其他文献的观点,即使用标准化同意书比手写同意书具有诸多优势。未来需要进行研究,以评估其在多个中心的实施情况,以便评估对临床医生和患者的预期益处。