Sutar Jyoti, Jayal Priyanka, Mullick Ranajoy, Chaudhary Sangeeta, Kamble Prajakta, Bhowmick Shilpa, Kaginkar Snehal, Padwal Varsha, Devadiga Pratik, Neman Namrata, Kitchin Dale, Kaldine Haajira, Mkhize Nonhlanhla N, Ndlovu Bongiwe, Gounder Kamini, Mukherjee Sohini, Shrivas Shweta, Sharma Neha, Prasad Chaman, Tewatia Sonia, Parihar Nainika, Kumar Naresh, Kasarpalkar Nandini, Singh Balwant, Mohapatra Shobha, Aquil Mohammad, Kumar C Vishal, Dinesha Thongadi Ramesh, Srikrishnan Aylur Kailasom, Shastri Jayanthi, Agrawal Sachee, Gaikwad Sushma, Mondal Sayantani, Bandyopadhyay Bhaswati, Guha Subhasish Kamal, Kale Dipesh, Biswas Debasis, Patil Dhanashree, Paranjape Ramesh S, Mukhopadhyay Satyajit, Das Ritika, Kondapi Anand, Bhor Vikrant, Deshpande Suprit, Sok Devin, Ndung'u Thumbi, Moore Penny L, Murugavel Kailapuri Gangatharan, Patel Vainav, Bhattacharya Jayanta
Antibody Translational Research Program, Center for Virus Research, Vaccines & Therapeutics, BRIC-Translational Health Science & Technology Institute, NCR Biotech Science Cluster, Faridabad, Haryana, India.
IAVI, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
J Virol. 2025 Jun 17;99(6):e0000825. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00008-25. Epub 2025 May 16.
While broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) have been clinically shown to prevent HIV-1 acquisition, their relative effectiveness against regionally relevant HIV-1 forms is not clear. In the present study, we examined the extent of neutralization susceptibility of contemporary HIV-1 Indian clade C at a population level along with a head-to-head comparison with that from South Africa against a panel of clinically relevant best-in-class bnAbs. Env-pseudotyped viruses encoding HIV-1 India clade C were found to be best neutralized by the V3 glycan-directed bnAbs (10-1074 and BG18) and select CD4 binding site (CD4bs)-directed bnAbs (VRC07, N6, and 1-18); however, they demonstrated significant resistance to V1/V2 apex-directed bnAbs. Interestingly, the magnitude of the neutralization sensitivity differed between contemporary India and South Africa clade C. Neutralization resistance to key bnAbs was observed to be associated with differences in residues on Env that form bnAb contact sites, gp120 loop lengths, and potential N-linked glycans. Notably, the second generation CD4bs bnAbs (VRC07, N6, 1-18) showed neutralization of VRC01- and 3BNC117-resistant viruses but with two- to sevenfold reduced potency compared to the VRC01-sensitive counterparts, likely due to the enrichment of resistance-associated residues observed in loop D. Predictive analysis indicated that the combination of BG18, N6, and PGDM1400 can provide over 95% neutralization coverage of contemporary India clade C at 1 µg/mL (IC80), an observation distinct from that observed with Africa clade C. Our study clearly highlights that both the complementarity of bnAb classes and the regionally relevant HIV-1 forms are important in achieving clinical effectiveness.IMPORTANCEWhile the development of vaccines to prevent HIV infection remains a global priority, their potential effectiveness is limited by the extraordinarily diversified circulating forms of HIV-1. The prospect of best-in-class broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) as a potential prevention option has been demonstrated in several studies, including the phase 2b Antibody-Mediated Prevention trials; however, to be broadly applicable, bnAbs will need to overcome the substantial variability of HIV circulating globally, beyond the regions where efficacy trials are conducted. The present study highlights that the region-specific contemporary HIV-1 clade C viruses not only vary in their degree of susceptibility to the best-in-class clinically relevant bnAbs, but also are evolving at a population level to become increasingly resistant to the best-in-class bnAbs. Overall, the outcome of this study highlights the need for periodic assessment of sequence and neutralization profiles of the circulating regionally relevant HIV-1 forms toward prioritizing the bnAb combination suitable for effective intervention.
虽然广泛中和抗体(bnAbs)已在临床上显示可预防HIV-1感染,但其对区域相关HIV-1毒株的相对有效性尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们在人群水平上检测了当代HIV-1印度C亚型的中和敏感性程度,并与南非的HIV-1印度C亚型进行了直接比较,采用了一组临床相关的同类最佳bnAbs。编码HIV-1印度C亚型的Env假型病毒被发现对V3聚糖导向的bnAbs(10-1074和BG18)和选定的CD4结合位点(CD4bs)导向的bnAbs(VRC07、N6和1-18)最敏感;然而,它们对V1/V2顶端导向的bnAbs表现出显著抗性。有趣的是,当代印度和南非C亚型之间的中和敏感性程度有所不同。观察到对关键bnAbs的中和抗性与Env上形成bnAb接触位点的残基差异、gp120环长度以及潜在的N-连接聚糖有关。值得注意的是,第二代CD4bs bnAbs(VRC07、N6、1-18)显示出对VRC01和3BNC117抗性病毒的中和作用,但与对VRC01敏感的对应物相比,效力降低了2至7倍,这可能是由于在环D中观察到抗性相关残基的富集。预测分析表明,BG18、N6和PGDM1400的组合在1µg/mL(IC80)时可提供超过95%的当代印度C亚型中和覆盖率,这一观察结果与非洲C亚型不同。我们的研究清楚地表明,bnAb类别互补性和区域相关HIV-1毒株对于实现临床有效性都很重要。
重要性
虽然开发预防HIV感染的疫苗仍然是全球优先事项,但其潜在有效性受到HIV-1极其多样化的流行毒株的限制。包括2b期抗体介导预防试验在内的多项研究已经证明了同类最佳广泛中和抗体(bnAbs)作为潜在预防选择的前景;然而,为了广泛适用,bnAbs需要克服全球HIV流行的巨大变异性,而不仅仅是在进行疗效试验的地区。本研究强调,区域特异性当代HIV-1 C亚型病毒不仅对同类最佳临床相关bnAbs的敏感程度不同,而且在人群水平上正在演变,对同类最佳bnAbs的抗性越来越强。总体而言,这项研究的结果突出了需要定期评估区域相关HIV-1流行毒株的序列和中和谱,以便优先选择适合有效干预的bnAb组合。