Williams Peter, Gage Heather, Jones Bridget, Aspden Carole, Smylie Jessica, Bird Thomas, Touray Morro M L, Brady Phelim, Campbell John, Chilvers Rupa, Marchand Catherine, Peckham Stephen, Richards Suzanne H, Spilsbury Karen, Joy Mark, de Lusignan Simon
Department of Mathematics, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK.
Surrey Health Economics Centre (SHEC), Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7WG, UK.
BMC Prim Care. 2025 May 17;26(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02780-7.
Measures are needed to address recruitment and retention problems in general practice in England. A good team climate, the relational processes of team working, can mitigate pressured work environments, but little is known about it.
To explore factors associated with more favourable team climates in general practices and investigate associations between team climate and outcomes for staff and practice performance.
All 6475 general practices in England were eligible to take part in an online cross-sectional survey. Clinical and non-clinical staff in practices were invited to participate. Data were gathered using the 14 item version of the Team Climate Inventory; analysis was conducted on 10 items because piloting indicated many participants could not answer four items about practice objectives. Secondary outcomes included single item measures of job satisfaction, intention to remain working in the practice and burnout. Practice performance measures were: attainment in the Quality and Outcomes pay-for-performance system (for clinical effectiveness) and patient experience ratings from the national General Practice Patient Survey. Staff outcomes were analysed, principally by role. Practices in which over 50% of staff participated were included in modelling of practice level outcomes.
A total of 9835 individual members of staff from 809 practices participated. Most indicated a favourable team climate in their practice, (mean 3.77, on scale 1-5 best, SD 0.84); 61.3% stated they were mostly or extremely satisfied in their jobs; 26.1% met the criteria for high burnout. General Practitioners, compared to other clinical and non-clinical staff, perceived team climate to be better, and reported less likelihood of leaving, yet lower job satisfaction and higher burnout. In practice-level modelling, team climate improved as practice size decreased. Staff outcomes (job satisfaction, likelihood of remaining in post, less burnout) were associated with a better practice team climate, as were patient experience ratings. Higher GP to patient ratios were associated with improved job satisfaction, less burnout and more favourable patient experience ratings.
Policies focussed on improving team climate could improve staff outcomes and contribute to mitigating the workforce crisis in general practice in England. Guidance on fostering good team climates is needed for practices.
需要采取措施解决英格兰全科医疗中的招聘和留用问题。良好的团队氛围,即团队协作的关系过程,能够缓解工作压力较大的工作环境,但对此了解甚少。
探讨与全科医疗中更有利的团队氛围相关的因素,并调查团队氛围与员工成果及医疗实践表现之间的关联。
英格兰所有6475家全科医疗诊所均有资格参加一项在线横断面调查。邀请诊所的临床和非临床工作人员参与。使用团队氛围调查问卷的14项版本收集数据;由于预试验表明许多参与者无法回答关于医疗实践目标的4个问题,因此对10个项目进行了分析。次要结果包括对工作满意度、留在该医疗实践工作的意愿以及职业倦怠的单项测量。医疗实践表现指标为:质量与结果绩效付费系统中的达标情况(用于衡量临床疗效)以及全国全科医疗患者调查中的患者体验评分。主要按角色对员工结果进行分析。超过50%的员工参与调查的诊所被纳入医疗实践层面结果的建模。
来自809家诊所的9835名员工个人参与了调查。大多数人表示他们所在的医疗实践团队氛围良好(平均分为3.77,满分5分,标准差为0.84);61.3%的人表示他们对工作大多或极其满意;26.1%的人符合职业倦怠程度高的标准。与其他临床和非临床工作人员相比,全科医生认为团队氛围更好,且表示离职可能性较小,但工作满意度较低且职业倦怠程度较高。在医疗实践层面的建模中,团队氛围随着医疗实践规模的减小而改善。员工结果(工作满意度、留任可能性、较低的职业倦怠)与更好的医疗实践团队氛围相关,患者体验评分也是如此。更高的全科医生与患者比例与更高的工作满意度、更低的职业倦怠以及更有利的患者体验评分相关。
专注于改善团队氛围的政策可以改善员工成果,并有助于缓解英格兰全科医疗中的劳动力危机。诊所需要有关营造良好团队氛围的指导。