Albaladejo Laura, Giai Joris, Deronne Cyril, Baude Romain, Bosson Jean-Luc, Bétry Cécile
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, UMR 5525, VetAgro Sup, Grenoble INP, TIMC, 38000 Grenoble, France.
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, UMR 5525, VetAgro Sup, Grenoble INP, TIMC, 38000 Grenoble, France; Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, CHU Grenoble Alpes, CIC 1406, 38000 Grenoble, France.
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2025 Aug;68:319-325. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.05.017. Epub 2025 May 17.
Accurate dietary intake assessment is essential for nutritional care in hospitals, yet it is time-consuming for caregivers and therefore not routinely performed. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) offer promising opportunities to streamline this process. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using an AI-based image recognition prototype, developed through machine learning algorithms, to automate dietary intake assessment within the hospital catering context.
Data were collected from inpatient meals in a hospital ward. The study was divided in two phases: the first one focused on data annotation and algorithm's development, while the second one was dedicated to algorithm's evaluation. Six different dishes were analyzed with their components grouped into three categories: cereals and starchy food, meat and fish, and vegetables. Manual weighing (MAN) was used as the reference method, while the AI-based prototype (PRO) automatically estimated component weights. Lin's concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) were calculated to assess agreement between PRO and MAN. Linear regression models were applied to estimate measurement differences between PRO and MAN for each category and their associated 95 % confidence intervals (CI).
A total of 246 components were used for data annotation and 368 for testing. CCC values between PRO and MAN were: Cereals and starchy food (n = 219; CCC = 0.957, 95 % CI: 0.945-0.965), meat and fish (n = 114; CCC = 0.845, 95 % CI: 0.787-0.888), and vegetables (n = 35; CCC = 0.767, 95 % CI: 0.604-0.868). Mean differences between PRO and MAN measurements were estimated at -12.01g (CI 95 % -15.3, -8,7) for cereals and starchy food (reference category), 1.19 g (CI 95 % -3.2, 5.6) for meat and fish, and -14.85 (CI 95 % -22.1, -7.58) for vegetables.
This pilot study demonstrates an AI-based system to assess food types and portions in a hospital setting. Further improvements are necessary before the system can be reliably used in direct patient care.
准确评估饮食摄入量对医院营养护理至关重要,但护理人员进行此项工作耗时较长,因此未能常规开展。人工智能(AI)的最新进展为简化这一流程提供了契机。本研究旨在评估在医院餐饮环境中使用基于机器学习算法开发的人工智能图像识别原型自动评估饮食摄入量的可行性。
收集某医院病房住院患者餐食的数据。该研究分为两个阶段:第一阶段聚焦于数据标注和算法开发,第二阶段致力于算法评估。分析了六种不同菜肴,其成分分为三类:谷物和淀粉类食物、肉类和鱼类以及蔬菜。采用人工称重(MAN)作为参考方法,而基于人工智能的原型(PRO)自动估算各成分重量。计算林氏一致性相关系数(CCC)以评估PRO与MAN之间的一致性。应用线性回归模型估算PRO与MAN在各类别之间的测量差异及其相关的95%置信区间(CI)。
共使用246个成分进行数据标注,368个用于测试。PRO与MAN之间的CCC值分别为:谷物和淀粉类食物(n = 219;CCC = 0.957,95% CI:0.945 - 0.965)、肉类和鱼类(n = 114;CCC = 0.845,95% CI:0.787 - 0.888)以及蔬菜(n = 35;CCC = 0.767,95% CI:0.604 - 0.868)。PRO与MAN测量值之间的平均差异估计为:谷物和淀粉类食物(参考类别)为 -12.01g(CI 95% -15.3,-8.7)、肉类和鱼类为1.19g(CI 95% -3.2,5.6)、蔬菜为 -14.85(CI 95% -22.1,-7.58)。
这项初步研究展示了一种基于人工智能的系统,可在医院环境中评估食物种类和份量。在该系统能够可靠地用于直接患者护理之前,还需要进一步改进。