Alam Jarin, West Juniper, Moniz-Cook Esme, Wolverson Emma, Handley Melanie, Birt Linda, Fox Chris
Research and Development, Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Faculty of Health Science, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom.
Front Psychiatry. 2025 May 6;16:1591772. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1591772. eCollection 2025.
Recovery Colleges (RC/RCs) aim to promote personal recovery through co-produced courses, grounded in the CHIME (Connectedness, Hope, Identity, Meaning, Empowerment) framework. The DiSCOVERY research programme noted that RC dementia courses may offer a person-centred approach to post-diagnostic dementia care. However, the lack of validated outcome measures for this context presents a challenge in evaluating RCs' effectiveness. This scoping review examines the potential outcome measures for evaluating the impact of RC dementia courses.
The review followed the Arksey and O'Malley framework, searching for eligible papers across six databases related to dementia and the CHIME strengths-based approach. Instruments relating to personal recovery and positive psychology for people with dementia or their family supporters were included. Measures of cognition, clinical symptoms, or 'negative constructs' (e.g., burden) were excluded. DiSCOVERY stakeholder groups (people with dementia and clinicians) met to collaboratively identify meaningful domains and relevant measures.
Fourteen instruments relating to hope, resilience, self-efficacy, empowerment, and coping were identified. Stakeholders of people living with dementia endorsed domains of empowerment, resilience, and hope. No single instrument captured the range of outcomes that underlie the concepts of the RC dementia course.
This study contributes to the limited literature on instruments for the evaluation of concepts underlying RC dementia courses. Findings suggest a need for adaptation and further validation of existing measures, to address responsiveness, interpretability, and the inclusion of domains related to recovery. Future research on recovery in the context of dementia should involve developing or adapting new measures, conducting feasibility studies, and exploring cultural sensitivity for diverse populations.
康复学院旨在通过基于CHIME(联系、希望、身份认同、意义、赋权)框架共同制作的课程来促进个人康复。“发现”研究项目指出,康复学院的痴呆症课程可能为诊断后痴呆症护理提供以患者为中心的方法。然而,在这一背景下缺乏经过验证的结果测量方法,这给评估康复学院的有效性带来了挑战。本范围综述探讨了评估康复学院痴呆症课程影响的潜在结果测量方法。
该综述遵循阿克西和奥马利框架,在六个与痴呆症和基于CHIME优势方法相关的数据库中搜索符合条件的论文。纳入了与痴呆症患者或其家庭支持者的个人康复和积极心理学相关的工具。排除了认知、临床症状或“负面构念”(如负担)的测量方法。“发现”利益相关者群体(痴呆症患者和临床医生)开会共同确定有意义的领域和相关测量方法。
确定了14种与希望、恢复力、自我效能感、赋权和应对相关的工具。痴呆症患者的利益相关者认可赋权、恢复力和希望等领域。没有单一的工具能够涵盖康复学院痴呆症课程概念背后的一系列结果。
本研究为关于评估康复学院痴呆症课程潜在概念的工具的有限文献做出了贡献。研究结果表明,需要对现有测量方法进行调整和进一步验证,以解决反应性、可解释性以及纳入与康复相关领域的问题。未来关于痴呆症背景下康复的研究应包括开发或调整新的测量方法、进行可行性研究以及探索对不同人群的文化敏感性。