Yokoyama Hisayuki, Fuji Shigeo, Murata Makoto, Hirayama Masahiro, Wake Atsushi, Uchida Naoyuki, Tanaka Masatsugu, Onizuka Makoto, Takahashi Satoshi, Doki Noriko, Maruyama Yumiko, Ishiwata Kazuya, Uehara Yasufumi, Nishida Tetsuya, Sawa Masashi, Kawakita Toshiro, Eto Tetsuya, Ishimaru Fumihiko, Kato Koji, Ichinohe Tatsuo, Atsuta Yoshiko, Terakura Seitaro, Morishima Satoko
Division of Hematology and Cell Therapy, Yamagata University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.
Department of Hematology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Ann Hematol. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s00277-025-06415-w.
This study evaluated the impact of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) on cord blood transplantation (CBT) outcomes based on human leukocyte antigen (HLA) disparity and GVHD prophylaxis type. Data from 4,196 adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, or myelodysplastic syndrome were analyzed. Patients were classified by HLA mismatch (8/8-6/8, 5/8, and 4/8-2/8) and further by GVHD prophylaxis type (methotrexate [MTX] or mycophenolate mofetil [MMF]). The impact of aGVHD was assessed using a time-dependent Cox model. Grade I-II aGVHD improved overall survival (OS) in all groups, regardless of HLA mismatches or prophylaxis type. However, grade III-IV aGVHD worsened OS across MMF groups, while in MTX groups, it was unfavorable only in the HLA 8/8-6/8-matched group (HR 1.6, P = 0.01). Grade III-IV aGVHD increased non-relapse mortality (NRM) across all groups but was more pronounced in HLA 4/8-2/8-matched patients receiving MMF. Notably, relapse risk decreased in HLA 4/8-2/8-matched patients with MTX prophylaxis, partially offsetting the negative impact of grade III-IV aGVHD on NRM. These findings suggest that the impact of aGVHD varies with HLA mismatches and prophylaxis type. MTX prophylaxis may mitigate the adverse effects of severe aGVHD in highly mismatched cases, unlike MMF prophylaxis. Careful donor selection considering HLA mismatches is essential when using MMF prophylaxis to manage severe aGVHD and reduce NRM risk.
本研究基于人类白细胞抗原(HLA)不相合程度和移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)预防类型,评估了急性移植物抗宿主病(aGVHD)对脐血移植(CBT)结局的影响。分析了4196例患有急性髓系白血病、急性淋巴细胞白血病或骨髓增生异常综合征的成年患者的数据。患者根据HLA错配情况(8/8 - 6/8、5/8和4/8 - 2/8)进行分类,并进一步根据GVHD预防类型(甲氨蝶呤[MTX]或霉酚酸酯[MMF])进行分类。使用时间依赖性Cox模型评估aGVHD的影响。无论HLA错配情况或预防类型如何,I - II级aGVHD均改善了所有组的总生存期(OS)。然而,III - IV级aGVHD使MMF组的OS恶化,而在MTX组中,仅在HLA 8/8 - 6/8相合组中不利(风险比1.6,P = 0.01)。III - IV级aGVHD增加了所有组的非复发死亡率(NRM),但在接受MMF的HLA 4/8 - 2/8相合患者中更为明显。值得注意的是,接受MTX预防的HLA 4/8 - 2/8相合患者的复发风险降低,部分抵消了III - IV级aGVHD对NRM的负面影响。这些发现表明,aGVHD的影响因HLA错配情况和预防类型而异。与MMF预防不同,MTX预防可能减轻高度错配病例中严重aGVHD的不良影响。在使用MMF预防来管理严重aGVHD并降低NRM风险时,考虑HLA错配情况进行仔细的供体选择至关重要。