Khan Sikandar H, Perkins Anthony J, Unverzagt Frederick W, Wang Sophia, Moser Lyndsi R, Moiz Salwa, Jawaid Samreen, Corlett Dexter, Clark Daniel O, Boustani Malaz A, Gao Sujuan, Khan Babar A
Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep and Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
IU Center of Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN.
Crit Care Med. 2025 Aug 1;53(8):e1542-e1553. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006698. Epub 2025 May 22.
To investigate the effects of a 12-week, web-based, combined cognitive and physical training intervention on cognitive performance among ICU delirium survivors.
Prospective, four-arm randomized controlled trial.
Four sites (academic, county, community ICUs).
ICU adults 50 years old or older with at least one instance of ICU delirium or subsyndromal delirium.
Patients were randomized to one of four groups: physical exercise-cognitive training (PE-CT), physical exercise-cognitive control (PE-CC), stretching control-cognitive training (SC-CT), or stretching control-cognitive control (SC-CC).
The primary outcome was cognitive function at 3 and 6 months after start of intervention, as assessed by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS). One hundred fifty-three patients were randomized to either: PE-CT, n = 41; PE-CC, n = 41; SC-CT, n = 36; or SC-CC, n = 35. There was a significant difference on changes in RBANS z scores among the four arms (interaction term p = 0.012). The mean RBANS z scores ranged from -2.66 to +1.43 (change in RBANS z score of ± 0.5-0.6 may be clinically significant). The SC-CT group had statistically significant worsening in cognitive scores compared with the SC-CC group at 3 (mean estimated difference in change from baseline, -0.28; 95% CI, -0.53 to -0.02; p = 0.035) and 6 months (mean estimated difference in change from baseline, -0.29; 95% CI, -0.53 to -0.04; p = 0.021). Compared with the SC-CC group, the PE-CC group had statistically significant worsening in cognitive scores at 6 month (mean estimated difference in change from baseline, -0.26; 95% CI, -0.49 to -0.02; p = 0.035). There were no significant differences between groups in physical or mental quality of life, depression, or anxiety outcomes at any of the timepoints.
The Improving Recovery and Outcomes Every Day After the ICU (IMPROVE) trial did not result in improved cognitive, physical, mental health, or quality of life measures at 3 or 6 months. We found a drop in cognitive performance among patients receiving cognitive training from baseline to 3 months postintervention.
研究一项为期12周、基于网络的认知与身体综合训练干预措施对重症监护病房(ICU)谵妄幸存者认知能力的影响。
前瞻性、四臂随机对照试验。
四个场所(学术性、县级、社区ICU)。
年龄在50岁及以上、至少有一次ICU谵妄或亚综合征性谵妄的成年ICU患者。
患者被随机分为四组之一:体育锻炼-认知训练(PE-CT)组、体育锻炼-认知控制(PE-CC)组、伸展控制-认知训练(SC-CT)组或伸展控制-认知控制(SC-CC)组。
主要结局指标为干预开始后3个月和6个月时的认知功能,采用可重复神经心理状态评估量表(RBANS)进行评估。153例患者被随机分组:PE-CT组,n = 41;PE-CC组,n = 41;SC-CT组,n = 36;或SC-CC组,n = 35。四组间RBANS z评分的变化存在显著差异(交互项p = 0.012)。RBANS z评分的均值范围为-2.66至+1.43(RBANS z评分变化±0.5 - 0.6可能具有临床意义)。与SC-CC组相比,SC-CT组在3个月时(从基线变化的平均估计差异,-0.28;95%CI,-0.53至-0.02;p = 0.035)和6个月时(从基线变化的平均估计差异,-0.29;95%CI,-0.53至-0.04;p = 0.021)认知得分有统计学意义的恶化。与SC-CC组相比,PE-CC组在6个月时认知得分有统计学意义的恶化(从基线变化的平均估计差异,-0.26;95%CI,-0.49至-0.02;p = 0.035)。在任何时间点,各组在身体或心理健康、抑郁或焦虑结局方面均无显著差异。
ICU后每日改善恢复和结局(IMPROVE)试验在3个月或6个月时未使认知、身体、心理健康或生活质量指标得到改善。我们发现接受认知训练的患者从基线到干预后3个月认知能力下降。