Ramji Saajan, Tan Jeremy C K, Jarrar Zakariya A, Hamid Sana, Gazzard Gus, Ansari Abdus Samad
From the Northwick Park Hospital (S.R.), London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales (J.C.K.T.), Sydney, Australia; Save Sight Institute (J.C.K.T.), University of Sydney, Sydney Australia.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2025 Sep;277:184-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2025.05.005. Epub 2025 May 20.
Trabeculectomy has long been established as the "gold standard" surgical procedure in the management of glaucoma when medical and laser options are deemed to be inadequate but has variable success due to fibrosis and scarring at the surgical site. Antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents have been investigated as adjuncts to improve surgical outcomes. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare trabeculectomy augmented with anti-VEGF and trabeculectomy without anti-VEGF for the treatment of glaucoma in an adult population. Specifically, this systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of anti-VEGF agents in enhancing trabeculectomy success, intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction, and medication reduction.
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42025636060). A systematic search was conducted in Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials comparing trabeculectomy with and without anti-VEGF agents in glaucoma. Primary outcomes included complete and qualified success rates as well as mean IOP reduction and reduction in IOP-lowering medications. Follow-up periods were 6, 12, and 24 months. Meta-analyses were conducted using Review Manager (version 5.4).
Sixteen studies comprising 1002 patients were included in the analysis. At 12 months, trabeculectomy with adjunctive mitomycin C (MMC) and anti-VEGF demonstrated significantly higher odds of achieving complete success (OR = 1.90, 95% CI [1.16, 3.10], P = .01). Specifically, intracameral or intravitreal bevacizumab was associated with improved odds of complete success at 12 months, with the 1.25 mg dose yielding a notable benefit (OR = 1.58, 95% CI [1.06, 2.36], P = .03). Additionally, trabeculectomy with MMC and bevacizumab significantly reduced the requirement for IOP-lowering medications (MD = 0.34, 95% CI [0.09, 0.60], P = .008). A risk-of-bias assessment classified 11 studies as low risk and 5 with some concerns.
Anti-VEGF agents improve trabeculectomy outcomes when used with Mitomycin-C, enhancing complete success rates and reducing medication needs. This analysis underscores the potential of anti-VEGF therapy as a valuable adjunct, though further research with standardized protocols is essential to strengthen these findings.
当药物和激光治疗方法被认为不足以治疗青光眼时,小梁切除术长期以来一直被确立为青光眼治疗的“金标准”手术,但由于手术部位的纤维化和瘢痕形成,其成功率存在差异。抗血管内皮生长因子(anti-VEGF)药物已被研究作为辅助手段以改善手术效果。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是比较在成人青光眼患者中,抗VEGF辅助小梁切除术与非抗VEGF小梁切除术的疗效。具体而言,本系统评价和荟萃分析评估了抗VEGF药物在提高小梁切除术成功率、降低眼压(IOP)和减少药物使用方面的疗效。
系统评价和荟萃分析
本系统评价和荟萃分析已在PROSPERO(CRD42025636060)上进行前瞻性注册。在Medline、EMBASE和Web of Science中进行系统检索,以查找比较青光眼患者小梁切除术使用和不使用抗VEGF药物的随机对照试验。主要结局包括完全成功率和合格成功率,以及平均眼压降低和降低眼压药物的减少情况。随访期为6、12和24个月。使用Review Manager(版本5.4)进行荟萃分析。
分析纳入了16项研究,共1002例患者。在12个月时,小梁切除术联合丝裂霉素C(MMC)和抗VEGF显示完全成功的几率显著更高(OR = 1.90,95% CI [1.16, 3.10],P = 0.01)。具体而言,前房内或玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗与12个月时完全成功几率的提高相关,1.25 mg剂量产生显著益处(OR = 1.58,95% CI [1.06, 2.36],P = 0.03)。此外,小梁切除术联合MMC和贝伐单抗显著降低了降低眼压药物的需求(MD = 0.34,95% CI [0.09, 0.60],P = 0.008)。偏倚风险评估将11项研究分类为低风险,5项研究存在一些问题。
抗VEGF药物与丝裂霉素C联合使用时可改善小梁切除术的效果,提高完全成功率并减少药物需求。该分析强调了抗VEGF治疗作为一种有价值辅助手段的潜力,不过采用标准化方案进行进一步研究对于强化这些发现至关重要。