Borriello Giuliano, Valentini Flaminia, Ferrini Sara, Di Muro Giorgia, Cagnotti Giulia, Grego Elena, Catania Angela Maria, Stella Maria Cristina, Ala Ugo, Nebbia Patrizia, D'Angelo Antonio, Bellino Claudio
Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Italy.
PLoS One. 2025 May 23;20(5):e0324469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324469. eCollection 2025.
Sepsis, a dysregulated host response to infection, severely affects calf health. To date, sepsis diagnosis relies on clinical examination and positive blood culture. Differently, in humans 16S rRNA gene analysis is a valuable adjunct to blood culture as it allows for broader assessment of bacterial DNA in whole blood and its fractions. However, its efficacy in cattle remains unknown. Therefore, this study characterized and compared the bacterial DNA detected in whole blood and its fractions between healthy calves and those showing clinical signs of sepsis. The study sample was 18 Piedmontese calves classified according to their clinical status as suspected septic (S, 8/18) or healthy (H, 10/18). Aseptic blood samples were collected into EDTA tubes for 16S rRNA gene analysis of whole blood (WB), plasma (PL), buffy coat (BC), and red blood cells (RBC). Aseptic samples were additionally taken only from the S calves for blood culture. Clinical and microbiological parameters were compared between the two groups and between the blood fractions within each group. The S calves were diagnosed with pneumonia (3/8, 37.5%), enteritis (3/8, 37.5%), and omphalitis (2/8, 25%). Microbiome analysis revealed significant intra-group differences in α and β diversity indices between PL and the other blood fractions for both groups. Comparison between the S and the H calves showed differences in β diversity indices for PL and WB. DNA of known pathogens (e.g., Escherichia coli) and species not commonly associated with sepsis (e.g., Cutibacterium acnes) were more abundant in the S calves. Moreover, in S calves, 16S rRNA gene sequencing detected E. coli DNA more often (8/8, 100%) than blood culture (2/8, 25%). While the DNA of several bacteria can be detected in calves showing clinical signs of sepsis, further studies are needed to clarify its origin, role, and distribution in blood fractions.
脓毒症是宿主对感染的一种失调反应,严重影响犊牛健康。迄今为止,脓毒症的诊断依赖于临床检查和血培养阳性结果。不同的是,在人类中,16S rRNA基因分析是血培养的一项有价值的辅助手段,因为它能够对全血及其组分中的细菌DNA进行更广泛的评估。然而,其在牛身上的功效尚不清楚。因此,本研究对健康犊牛和出现脓毒症临床症状的犊牛全血及其组分中检测到的细菌DNA进行了特征分析和比较。研究样本为18头皮埃蒙特犊牛,根据临床状态分为疑似脓毒症组(S组,8/18)和健康组(H组,10/18)。无菌血样采集到EDTA管中,用于对全血(WB)、血浆(PL)、血沉棕黄层(BC)和红细胞(RBC)进行16S rRNA基因分析。另外,仅从S组犊牛采集无菌样本进行血培养。比较了两组之间以及每组内不同血液组分之间的临床和微生物学参数。S组犊牛被诊断为肺炎(3/8,37.5%)、肠炎(3/8,37.5%)和脐炎(2/8,25%)。微生物组分析显示,两组中PL与其他血液组分之间的α和β多样性指数存在显著的组内差异。S组和H组犊牛之间的比较显示,PL和WB的β多样性指数存在差异。已知病原体(如大肠杆菌)和通常与脓毒症无关的物种(如痤疮丙酸杆菌)的DNA在S组犊牛中更为丰富。此外,在S组犊牛中,16S rRNA基因测序检测到大肠杆菌DNA的频率(8/8,100%)高于血培养(2/8,25%)。虽然在出现脓毒症临床症状的犊牛中可以检测到几种细菌的DNA,但仍需要进一步研究来阐明其来源、作用以及在血液组分中的分布。