Wu Ying, Liu Xing, Ge Xiaoying, Tan Xin, Yu Weiwei, Wang Xiaomin
School of Humanities, Central South University, Changsha, 410012, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 May 26;26(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01222-4.
With the extensive integration of digital technology into clinical research, intelligence, virtualization, and decentralization have gradually transformed into emerging clinical research modes, the electronization of informed consent has become indispensable to the development of clinical trial informatization, and the inclination to use electronic informed consent (eIC) has grown. The knowledge and perceptions of research participants, as objects of informed consent acquisition, regarding eIC are crucial. However, few studies have empirically explored such issues.
This cross-sectional study was conducted at three general hospitals in south-central China from July to September 2022. An online survey questionnaire was adapted and administered via WeChat to investigate the issues of interest.
A total of 388 valid questionnaires were included in the analysis. The results showed that the overall response rate for the knowledge section of the questionnaire exceeded 70%. Of the respondents, 53.1% had heard of the term "electronic informed consent," but only 43.2% had used eIC. The majority of respondents (68%) expressed a preference for using eIC and demonstrated a positive attitude toward it. However, some participants expressed concerns regarding the security and confidentiality (64.4%), operational complexity (52.3%), and effectiveness of online interaction (59.3%) in eIC. Statistically significant relationships were observed between participants' attitude scores and their age, gender, type of participation, and frequency of involvement in clinical research. Additionally, a positive and statistically significant correlation was found between participants' knowledge scores and their attitude scores.
The results of this study indicate that most participants have a good understanding of eIC-related knowledge and hold a positive attitude toward its implementation. However, they also express concerns about data protection and privacy security in eIC. These findings provide a foundation for developing targeted strategies to enhance the adoption and acceptance of eIC among diverse populations.
随着数字技术广泛融入临床研究,智能化、虚拟化和去中心化已逐渐转变为新兴的临床研究模式,知情同意电子化已成为临床试验信息化发展不可或缺的一部分,使用电子知情同意(eIC)的倾向也在增加。作为知情同意获取对象的研究参与者对eIC的了解和认知至关重要。然而,很少有研究对这些问题进行实证探索。
本横断面研究于2022年7月至9月在中国中南部的三家综合医院进行。通过微信改编并发放在线调查问卷来调查相关问题。
分析共纳入388份有效问卷。结果显示,问卷知识部分的总体回答率超过70%。在受访者中,53.1%听说过“电子知情同意”一词,但只有43.2%使用过eIC。大多数受访者(68%)表示倾向于使用eIC,并对其持积极态度。然而,一些参与者对eIC中的安全性和保密性(64.4%)、操作复杂性(52.3%)以及在线互动的有效性(59.3%)表示担忧。观察到参与者的态度得分与他们的年龄、性别、参与类型以及参与临床研究的频率之间存在统计学上的显著关系。此外,参与者的知识得分与态度得分之间存在正相关且具有统计学意义。
本研究结果表明,大多数参与者对eIC相关知识有较好的理解,并对其实施持积极态度。然而,他们也对eIC中的数据保护和隐私安全表示担忧。这些发现为制定针对性策略以提高不同人群对eIC的采用和接受度提供了基础。