Michael Sarah, Naseer Afifa, Tarazi Munir, Vadhwana Bhamini
Department of General Surgery, Salford Royal Hospital, Northern Care Alliance, Salford, England, M6 8HD, United Kingdom.
Department of General Surgery, West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Vicarage Road, Watford, England, WD18 0HB, United Kingdom.
BMC Surg. 2025 May 26;25(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02931-8.
Ventral hernias represent a significant global healthcare burden. Repair under local anaesthesia (LA) provides benefits to patients, hospitals and economies. While inguinal hernia repair under LA has been established, this has not translated to other abdominal wall hernias. This systematic review evaluates the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of performing these repairs under LA.
A systematic review was conducted using OVID EMBASE and MEDLINE to review articles published between 1966 and 2023. Thirty-three papers were included examining variables such as type of hernia, complications, cost-effectiveness, LA used and length of stay. All papers were quality assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Papers assessing inguinal hernias were excluded.
13,491 patients underwent ventral hernia repair under LA. Complication rates for LA repairs are low, with wound infections and hematomas ranging from 0.3 to 2%. Recurrence rates were also low (0.3-2.5%). Early mobilisation and same-day discharge were notable benefits, with over 97% of patients ambulatory within hours. Postoperative pain was minimal, contributing to high patient satisfaction rates (90-97%). LA repairs proved especially beneficial for high-risk groups, including elderly and frail patients. However, these findings were only seen in hernia defects less than 5 cm. Heterogeneity among study populations, small sample sizes, and lack of standardisation in LA administration were noted.
This review supports the broader implementation of LA for ventral hernia repairs in small defects (< 5 cm), demonstrating its safety, feasibility, and patient acceptability. Careful patient selection for standardisation of best practices for LA hernia repairs offers the potential for significant cost-savings with overall favourable outcomes.
腹疝是一项重大的全球医疗负担。局部麻醉(LA)下进行修复对患者、医院和经济均有益处。虽然局部麻醉下腹股沟疝修补术已得到确立,但这尚未应用于其他腹壁疝。本系统评价评估了在局部麻醉下进行这些修复的可行性、安全性和有效性。
使用OVID EMBASE和MEDLINE进行系统评价,以回顾1966年至2023年发表的文章。纳入了33篇论文,研究变量包括疝的类型、并发症、成本效益、使用的局部麻醉方法和住院时间。所有论文均使用ROBINS-I工具进行质量评估。排除评估腹股沟疝的论文。
13491例患者在局部麻醉下接受了腹疝修补术。局部麻醉修复的并发症发生率较低,伤口感染和血肿发生率在0.3%至2%之间。复发率也较低(0.3% - 2.5%)。早期活动和当日出院是显著的益处,超过97%的患者在数小时内即可下床活动。术后疼痛轻微,患者满意度较高(90% - 97%)。局部麻醉修复对高危人群尤其有益,包括老年和体弱患者。然而,这些结果仅见于疝缺损小于5厘米的情况。研究人群存在异质性、样本量小以及局部麻醉给药缺乏标准化。
本评价支持在小缺损(<5厘米)的腹疝修补术中更广泛地应用局部麻醉,证明了其安全性、可行性和患者可接受性。仔细选择患者以标准化局部麻醉疝修补的最佳实践,有可能显著节省成本并取得总体良好的结果。