Ibrayeva Lyazat, Aubakirova Meruyert, Bacheva Irina, Alina Assel, Bazarova Nazira, Zhanabayeva Aizhan, Avdiyenko Olga, Borchashvili Seda, Tazhikhanova Saltanat, Murzabaeyev Askhat
Department of Internal Medicine, Karaganda Medical University, Karaganda 100012, Kazakhstan.
Administration Department, Regional Clinical Hospital of Karaganda, Karaganda 100000, Kazakhstan.
J Pers Med. 2025 May 20;15(5):206. doi: 10.3390/jpm15050206.
: This study aims to investigate the potential etiopathogenesis of HFpEF development and identify possible different phenotypes of HFpEF in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung diseases (SS-ILDs). It could help clinicians improve early HFpEF personalized detection and management. : This study included 150 patients with chronic lung diseases (CLDs), such as COPD and SS-ILD, who were outside of exacerbation, had no history of chronic heart failure (CHF), and had a left ventricular ejection fraction (LV EF) of ≥50%. The functional status of the lungs, heart, endothelial dysfunction, and acid-base balance was assessed. The results obtained were compared in groups of patients with CLD depending on the presence or absence of HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The diagnosis of HFpEF was established based on the HFA-PEFF Score classification. Nonparametric statistical methods were used. : In patients with CLD, indicators such as age, longitudinal size of the right atrium, mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP), and highly sensitive cardiac troponin T (hsTnT) were higher than in the group of patients without HFpEF. In patients with COPD and HFpEF, statistically significant changes were found in the volume of the left atrium. In patients with SS-ILD and HFpEF, statistically significant differenceswere found in SBP before and after the 6 min walk test (6MWT), the Borg scale before 6MWT, MR-proANP, and the longitudinal dimension of the right atrium. : The results of our study allow us to identify two different mechanisms of HFpEF development: In patients with COPD, the predominant factor in the development of HFpEF was hypoxia, while in patients with SS-ILD, myocardial dysfunction with remodeling developed against the background of secondary pulmonary hypertension, highlighting the importance of phenotype-specific evaluation. These findings suggest potential approaches for personalized risk stratification and the development of targeted management strategies for patients with HFpEF.
本研究旨在探讨射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)发生发展的潜在病因机制,并确定慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和系统性硬化症相关间质性肺疾病(SS-ILDs)患者中HFpEF可能存在的不同表型。这有助于临床医生改善HFpEF的早期个性化检测与管理。本研究纳入了150例慢性肺病(CLD)患者,如COPD和SS-ILD患者,这些患者处于非加重期,无慢性心力衰竭(CHF)病史,且左心室射血分数(LV EF)≥50%。评估了肺功能、心脏功能、内皮功能障碍及酸碱平衡情况。根据是否存在射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF),将CLD患者分组并比较所得结果。HFpEF的诊断基于HFA-PEFF评分分类标准。采用非参数统计方法。在CLD患者中,年龄、右心房纵向大小、中段心房利钠肽前体(MR-proANP)和高敏心肌肌钙蛋白T(hsTnT)等指标高于无HFpEF的患者组。在COPD合并HFpEF的患者中,左心房容积有统计学显著变化。在SS-ILD合并HFpEF的患者中,6分钟步行试验(6MWT)前后收缩压、6MWT前的Borg量表、MR-proANP及右心房纵向维度有统计学显著差异。我们的研究结果使我们能够确定HFpEF发生发展的两种不同机制:在COPD患者中,HFpEF发生发展的主要因素是缺氧,而在SS-ILD患者中,心肌功能障碍伴重塑是在继发性肺动脉高压背景下发生的,突出了表型特异性评估的重要性。这些发现提示了针对HFpEF患者进行个性化风险分层及制定靶向管理策略的潜在方法。