Mazingi Dennis, Puvanachandra Prasanthi, Piragauta Alejandra, Chinkonda Bosco Exson, Nzanga Monica, Chokotho Linda, Peden Margaret Mary
The George Institute for Global Health UK, London W12 7RZ, UK.
School of Public Health, Imperial College, London W12 0BZ, UK.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 May 12;22(5):758. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22050758.
Road traffic injuries (RTIs) and air pollution present dual burdens that disproportionately affect school-going children in low-income urban settings like Malawi. Despite availability of evidence-based interventions, their implementation often overlooks local contexts and perspectives. This study aimed to elicit stakeholder input on interventions addressing RTIs and air pollution exposure among children in urban Blantyre through stakeholder engagement. It used a mixed method Delphi technique combining expert consultations with community focus groups to achieve consensus on interventions. Successive rounds of prioritization and qualitative discussions explored contextual barriers and facilitators to implementation. Stakeholders identified 40 interventions, 23 for road safety and 17 for air pollution. Measures prioritized by experts included speed limit enforcement, pedestrian infrastructure improvements, and emission controls. Contextual barriers identified by experts and the community included socio-political and financial constraints. Community perspectives emphasized behavioral interventions, while experts highlighted systemic and legislative changes. The study underscored the value of combining expert and community perspectives to design context-sensitive interventions. Synergies between road safety and air pollution interventions offer opportunities for dual benefits but require careful adaptation to urban Malawi's realities. This study provides a model for participatory design in low-income settings, emphasizing stakeholder engagement for tailored solutions.
道路交通伤害(RTIs)和空气污染带来了双重负担,对马拉维等低收入城市地区的学龄儿童产生了不成比例的影响。尽管有基于证据的干预措施,但这些措施的实施往往忽视了当地情况和观点。本研究旨在通过利益相关者参与,征求利益相关者对解决布兰太尔市儿童道路交通伤害和空气污染暴露问题的干预措施的意见。该研究采用了混合方法德尔菲技术,将专家咨询与社区焦点小组相结合,以就干预措施达成共识。连续几轮的优先排序和定性讨论探讨了实施过程中的背景障碍和促进因素。利益相关者确定了40项干预措施,其中23项用于道路安全,17项用于空气污染。专家们优先考虑的措施包括限速执法、行人基础设施改善和排放控制。专家和社区确定的背景障碍包括社会政治和财政限制。社区观点强调行为干预,而专家则强调系统和立法变革。该研究强调了结合专家和社区观点以设计因地制宜的干预措施的价值。道路安全和空气污染干预措施之间的协同作用提供了实现双重效益的机会,但需要根据马拉维城市的实际情况进行谨慎调整。本研究为低收入环境下的参与式设计提供了一个模型,强调利益相关者参与以制定量身定制的解决方案。