Nazir Abubakar, Nazir Awais, Afzaal Usama, Aman Shafaq, Sadiq Safi Ur Rehman, Akah Ozoemena Z, Jamal Muhammad Shah Wali, Hassan Syed Zawahir
Oli Health Magazine Organization, Research and Education Kigali Rwanda.
Department of Medicine King Edward Medical University Lahore Pakistan.
Health Sci Rep. 2025 May 26;8(5):e70878. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70878. eCollection 2025 May.
CVDs is a leading cause of morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditure worldwide. Identifying individuals at risk or in the incipient stages of disease is instrumental in enabling timely interventions, preventive measures, and tailored treatment regimens. The landscape of CVDs is complicated by their heterogeneity, encompassing a spectrum of conditions such as coronary artery disease, heart failure, arrhythmias, and valvular disorders. In recent years, the integration of biomarkers into cardiovascular medicine has emerged as a paradigm-shifting approach with the potential to revolutionize early detection and risk stratification. By synthesizing a multitude of studies, we aim to provide a comprehensive resource that illuminates the transformative potential of biomarkers in ushering in a new era of precision cardiovascular medicine.
To identify the biomarkers for the detection and diagnosis of CVDs.
This review examines key studies from 2015 to the present that investigate the impact of cardiac biomarkers on cardiovascular outcomes. Data were gathered from PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase to ensure a comprehensive analysis. The review focuses on various cardiac biomarkers, assessing their levels and changes in relation to cardiovascular health, with special emphasis on advanced biomarkers such as proteomic and metabolomic markers in cardiovascular disease (CVD) diagnosis. Peer-reviewed studies published in English that evaluated the diagnostic, prognostic, or therapeutic role of cardiac biomarkers were included, with priority given to clinical trials, cohort studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses providing quantitative biomarker data. Studies unrelated to cardiac biomarkers, case reports, editorials, conference abstracts, and those with small sample sizes or insufficient methodological rigor were excluded. The review also accounts for potential confounding factors and research limitations, ensuring a balanced assessment of the literature. By synthesizing data from academic papers, clinical reports, and research articles, this study provides a comprehensive evaluation of the evolving role of cardiac biomarkers in CVD diagnosis and risk stratification.
Biomarkers play a pivotal role in cardiovascular disease risk prediction, diagnosis, and treatment by providing dynamic biological insights. High-sensitivity cardiac troponins (hs-cTn) enhance myocardial injury detection, while circulating microRNAs (miR-208, miR-499) serve as early indicators of myocardial infarction and heart failure. Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] predicts long-term cardiovascular risk, and inflammatory biomarkers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) are linked to adverse outcomes. Multi-biomarker panels, such as hs-cTn with B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), improve heart failure prognosis, while metabolomic profiling enables precision medicine. Additionally, biomarkers like BNP and NT-proBNP facilitate real-time therapeutic monitoring. These findings underscore the critical role of biomarkers in refining risk stratification, improving diagnostic accuracy, and enabling personalized treatment strategies in cardiovascular medicine.
The advancement of cardiovascular biomarkers has significantly enhanced early detection, risk stratification, and personalized treatment. Emerging biomarkers, including genetic variants, metabolomics, microRNAs, and imaging-based markers, provide deeper insights into disease mechanisms. Integrating multi-omic approaches with artificial intelligence may further refine predictive accuracy and therapeutic decision-making. However, clinical translation requires rigorous validation through large-scale, multicenter studies to ensure reliability and applicability across diverse populations. Standardization, cost-effectiveness assessments, and the development of biomarker panels are essential for clinical adoption. Future research should focus on bridging discovery and implementation, advancing precision medicine to improve cardiovascular outcomes.
心血管疾病(CVDs)是全球发病、死亡及医疗支出的主要原因。识别处于疾病风险或疾病初期阶段的个体,对于及时进行干预、采取预防措施以及制定个性化治疗方案至关重要。心血管疾病的情况因其异质性而变得复杂,涵盖了一系列病症,如冠状动脉疾病、心力衰竭、心律失常和瓣膜疾病。近年来,将生物标志物整合到心血管医学中已成为一种范式转变的方法,有可能彻底改变早期检测和风险分层。通过综合众多研究,我们旨在提供一份全面的资源,阐明生物标志物在引领精准心血管医学新时代方面的变革潜力。
确定用于检测和诊断心血管疾病的生物标志物。
本综述考察了2015年至今的关键研究,这些研究探讨了心脏生物标志物对心血管结局的影响。数据从PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和Embase收集,以确保进行全面分析。该综述聚焦于各种心脏生物标志物,评估它们与心血管健康相关的水平和变化,特别强调心血管疾病(CVD)诊断中的蛋白质组学和代谢组学标志物等先进生物标志物。纳入了以英文发表的、评估心脏生物标志物诊断、预后或治疗作用的同行评审研究,优先考虑提供定量生物标志物数据的临床试验、队列研究、系统评价和荟萃分析。排除与心脏生物标志物无关的研究、病例报告、社论、会议摘要以及样本量小或方法学严谨性不足的研究。该综述还考虑了潜在的混杂因素和研究局限性,确保对文献进行平衡评估。通过综合学术论文、临床报告和研究文章的数据,本研究对心脏生物标志物在心血管疾病诊断和风险分层中不断演变的作用进行了全面评估。
生物标志物通过提供动态生物学见解,在心血管疾病风险预测、诊断和治疗中发挥关键作用。高敏心肌肌钙蛋白(hs-cTn)增强了心肌损伤检测,而循环微小RNA(miR-208、miR-499)是心肌梗死和心力衰竭的早期指标。脂蛋白(a) [Lp(a)]预测长期心血管风险,炎症生物标志物如C反应蛋白(CRP)和白细胞介素-6(IL-6)与不良结局相关。多生物标志物组合,如hs-cTn与B型利钠肽(BNP),可改善心力衰竭预后,而代谢组学分析有助于实现精准医学。此外,BNP和NT-proBNP等生物标志物有助于实时治疗监测。这些发现强调了生物标志物在完善心血管医学风险分层、提高诊断准确性和制定个性化治疗策略方面的关键作用。
心血管生物标志物的进展显著增强了早期检测、风险分层和个性化治疗。包括基因变异、代谢组学、微小RNA和基于成像的标志物在内的新兴生物标志物,为疾病机制提供了更深入的见解。将多组学方法与人工智能相结合,可能会进一步提高预测准确性和治疗决策能力。然而,临床转化需要通过大规模、多中心研究进行严格验证,以确保在不同人群中的可靠性和适用性。标准化、成本效益评估以及生物标志物组合的开发对于临床应用至关重要。未来的研究应专注于弥合发现与实施之间的差距,推进精准医学以改善心血管结局。