Suppr超能文献

针对医学和卫生保健专业学生的基于模拟的感染预防与控制培训:一项系统综述

Simulation-based infection prevention and control training for medical and healthcare students: a systematic review.

作者信息

Yoshikawa Akira, Ohtsuka Hiroyuki, Aoki Keiichiro, Tashiro Naonori, Togo Shusuke, Komaba Kazuki, Nogawa Satoshi, Osawa Miwa, Enokida Megumi

机构信息

Division of Morphology, Anatomy and Physiology, Department of Medical Basics, Specialty and Education, Showa Medical University, Graduate School of Nursing and Rehabilitation Sciences, Yokohama, Japan.

Division of Neurological Science, Department of Rehabilitation, Showa Medical University, Graduate School of Nursing and Rehabilitation Sciences, Yokohama, Japan.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 May 14;12:1529557. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1529557. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Infection prevention and control education has traditionally been conducted in a lecture-based manner, and simulation-based educational strategies have become increasingly prevalent in the field of medical education in recent years. This systematic review aimed to compare the effectiveness of the simulation-based and traditional strategies of infection prevention and control education and to show the differences between these educational approaches. Furthermore, we identified the characteristics of simulation-based strategies for infection prevention and control education.

METHOD

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A systematic literature search was conducted using the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases for articles published between January 1990 and September 2022. This study focused on students enrolled in medical and health professional courses. As such, healthcare professionals already working in clinical settings, as well as kindergarten and elementary school students were excluded from the study. The quality of the included studies and the risk of bias in each study were assessed. A total of 254 articles were identified; 21 underwent secondary screening. Ultimately, 10 articles were selected for the final review.

RESULTS

Educational strategies between simulation- and lecture-based education showed improvements in knowledge acquisition. There was no significant difference in the rate of improvement between the two educational strategies. The characteristics of simulation-based educational strategies included confidence in skill performance, decision-making and problem-solving skills, emotional aspects related to infectious diseases (such as fear, empathy, self-reflection, and integration of complex information), and student satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review suggests that simulation-based education is effective in developing students' skills and attitudes, while traditional lecture-based methods are more suited for reinforcing students' knowledge. Therefore, it is essential to choose educational strategies based on specific learning objectives and outcomes.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

This systematic review protocol was preregistered in the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/uj623/.

摘要

引言

传统上,感染预防与控制教育是以讲座的形式进行的,近年来,基于模拟的教育策略在医学教育领域越来越普遍。本系统评价旨在比较基于模拟的和传统的感染预防与控制教育策略的有效性,并展示这些教育方法之间的差异。此外,我们还确定了基于模拟的感染预防与控制教育策略的特点。

方法

根据系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南进行系统评价和Meta分析。使用CENTRAL、MEDLINE和Scopus数据库对1990年1月至2022年9月发表的文章进行系统文献检索。本研究聚焦于医学和健康专业课程的学生。因此,已在临床环境中工作的医疗专业人员以及幼儿园和小学生被排除在研究之外。对纳入研究的质量和每项研究的偏倚风险进行了评估。共识别出254篇文章;21篇进行了二次筛选。最终,10篇文章被选入最终评价。

结果

基于模拟的教育和基于讲座的教育策略在知识获取方面均有提高。两种教育策略在提高率上没有显著差异。基于模拟的教育策略的特点包括技能操作信心、决策和解决问题的能力、与传染病相关的情感方面(如恐惧、同理心、自我反思和复杂信息的整合)以及学生满意度。

结论

本系统评价表明,基于模拟的教育在培养学生技能和态度方面是有效的,而传统的基于讲座的方法更适合强化学生的知识。因此,根据具体的学习目标和结果选择教育策略至关重要。

系统评价注册

本系统评价方案已在开放科学框架中预先注册:https://osf.io/uj623/

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a4c3/12116496/baa8cceaa0fe/fmed-12-1529557-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验