Savarino Edoardo Vincenzo, Barberio Brigida, Scarpignato Carmelo, Savarino Vincenzo, Barbara Giovanni, Bertin Luisa, Bonazzi Erica, de Bortoli Nicola, Sario Antonio Di, Esposito Giuseppe, Frazzoni Marzio, Galloro Giuseppe, Gatta Luigi, Ghisa Matteo, Londoni Claudio, Marabotto Elisa, Meggio Alberto, Pisani Antonio, Ribolsi Mentore, Satta Paolo Usai, Stanghellini Vincenzo, Tosetti Cesare, Visaggi Pierfrancesco, Zingone Fabiana, Pesce Marcella, Sarnelli Giovanni
Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova, University of Padova, Italy.
Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova, University of Padova, Italy.
Dig Liver Dis. 2025 May 30. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2025.04.020.
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common conditions encountered in outpatient general medicine and gastroenterology clinics. However, uncertainties remain, particularly concerning the optimal diagnostic work-up and the most effective management. To address this issue, experts from 5 Italian Societies conducted a Delphi consensus process, which included a review of the current literature and voting process on 27 key statements. Recommendations and quality of evidence were evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Consensus for each statement was defined as ≥ 80 % agreement. Diagnostic Approach: The consensus supports a symptom-based diagnostic strategy for GERD, focusing on the exclusion of alarm symptoms and/or multiple risk factors for Barrett's esophagus or eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) as well as non-GERD causes in cases of extra-esophageal symptoms. Esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (EGD) is recommended in patients with alarm features or in patients unresponsive to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). In addition, the consensus recommends esophageal pH-metry or impedance-pH recording in patients with reflux-like symptoms not responding to medical treatments, in those with extra-oesophageal symptoms, prior to anti-reflux endoscopic or surgical procedures, in patients with belching disorders and to diagnose functional heartburn (FH) and reflux hypersensitivity (RH) in PPI-refractory patients. Treatment Approach: The consensus strongly supports a standard 4-8 weeks course of PPIs for patients with heartburn and regurgitation but without alarm symptoms and an 8 weeks treatment for those with erosive oesophagitis. Twice daily dose PPIs is recommended only if a concomitant Barrett oesophagus is present, in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) or when there is no response or an incomplete response to once daily dose. Bedtime histamine-2 receptor antagonists (HRAs) as add-on therapy is suggested in patients with persistent nocturnal symptoms and in those with objective evidence of nocturnal acid reflux on pH monitoring despite PPI treatment, while prokinetic agents are advocated as add-on therapy in patients with concomitant symptoms suggestive of delayed gastric emptying. Moreover, the consensus voted for the use of potassium competitive acid blockers (P-CABs), antacids, alginate-containing formulations, neuromodulators in treating visceral hypersensitivity, complementary and alternative medicine and anti-reflux surgery in patients with refractory GERD. Finally, the consensus voted against surgical anti-reflux therapy in patients with extra-esophageal symptoms of GERD, who do not respond to PPI therapy and against the use of ensoscopic procedures [i.e., Medigus ultrasonic surgical endostapler (MUSE), radiofrequency energy application (Stretta), anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS)] outside clinical trials.
胃食管反流病(GERD)是门诊普通内科和胃肠病诊所中最常见的病症之一。然而,仍存在不确定性,尤其是在最佳诊断检查和最有效治疗方面。为解决这一问题,来自5个意大利学会的专家进行了德尔菲共识过程,其中包括对当前文献的回顾以及对27项关键陈述的投票过程。使用推荐分级、评估、制定和评价(GRADE)标准对推荐意见和证据质量进行评估。每项陈述的共识定义为≥80%的同意率。诊断方法:共识支持基于症状的GERD诊断策略,重点是排除警示症状和/或巴雷特食管或嗜酸性食管炎(EoE)的多种危险因素,以及食管外症状患者的非GERD病因。对于有警示特征的患者或对质子泵抑制剂(PPI)无反应的患者,建议进行食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)。此外,共识建议对药物治疗无反应的反流样症状患者、有食管外症状的患者、抗反流内镜或手术前的患者、有嗳气障碍的患者以及诊断PPI难治性患者的功能性烧心(FH)和反流超敏反应(RH)时,进行食管pH测量或阻抗-pH记录。治疗方法:共识强烈支持对有烧心和反流但无警示症状的患者采用标准的4-8周PPI疗程,对糜烂性食管炎患者采用8周治疗。仅在伴有巴雷特食管、患有喉咽反流病(LPRD)或对每日一次剂量无反应或反应不完全的患者中,建议使用每日两次剂量的PPI。对于持续夜间症状的患者以及尽管接受PPI治疗但pH监测有夜间酸反流客观证据的患者,建议睡前使用组胺-2受体拮抗剂(HRA)作为附加治疗,而对于伴有提示胃排空延迟症状的患者,提倡使用促动力剂作为附加治疗。此外,共识投票赞成在难治性GERD患者中使用钾竞争性酸阻滞剂(P-CAB)、抗酸剂、含藻酸盐制剂、治疗内脏超敏反应的神经调节剂、补充和替代医学以及抗反流手术。最后,共识投票反对对GERD食管外症状且对PPI治疗无反应的患者进行手术抗反流治疗,以及反对在临床试验之外使用内镜手术[即Medigus超声手术吻合器(MUSE)、射频能量应用(Stretta)、抗反流粘膜切除术(ARMS)]。