Wilson Todd, Dalton Maria, Bhagat Nirav, Har Bryan, Abatan Doyin, Hazlewood Glen, Santana Maria-Jose, Semeniuk Gary, Kayode Ayotunde, Parmar Sukhwant, Pearson Winnie, Alhmoudi Aishah Matar Mohamed Mobarak, Sharma Nishan, Wilton Stephen, Graham Michelle, James Matthew, Sajobi Tolulope
Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 4;15(6):e094587. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094587.
The selection of the optimal treatment strategy remains one of the most challenging decisions in the management of coronary artery disease (CAD). Surgical and percutaneous coronary revascularisation are two widely used treatments for managing CAD and can result in improved outcomes compared with medications alone. Current practice guidelines recommend revascularisation for multivessel CAD for most patients. However, there remains uncertainty about whether revascularisation or medical therapy is optimal for managing multivessel disease for many patients, especially, in the elderly and those living with multimorbidity. Also, there is limited understanding of patient preferences towards candidate treatment options for multivessel disease. This study aims to quantify and characterise heterogeneity in patient preferences towards treatment options for multivessel CAD.
We have designed and will administer a discrete choice experiment to elicit and quantify preferences of people with multivessel CAD towards revascularisation and optimal medical therapy for managing multivessel CAD. Multinomial logit mixed effects and hierarchical Bayes models will be used to model the association between the participants' choices and the attributes and their different levels. The relative importance of the attributes will be assessed using the size of coefficients and marginal rate of substitution (MRS), a measure of the willingness to accept a trade-off among different options. Heterogeneity in patient preferences will be evaluated using latent class analysis.
Ethical approval for this study was granted by the University of Calgary Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board. Findings from this study will inform the development of clinical decision support tool that integrates patient preferences with clinical risk information to support patient-care provider discussion about optimal treatment for multivessel CAD management.
在冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的管理中,选择最佳治疗策略仍然是最具挑战性的决策之一。外科手术和经皮冠状动脉血运重建是治疗CAD广泛使用的两种方法,与单纯药物治疗相比,可改善治疗效果。目前的实践指南建议大多数多支血管CAD患者进行血运重建。然而,对于许多患者,尤其是老年人和患有多种疾病的患者,血运重建或药物治疗哪种是管理多支血管疾病的最佳选择仍存在不确定性。此外,对于多支血管疾病患者对候选治疗方案的偏好了解有限。本研究旨在量化和描述多支血管CAD患者对治疗方案偏好的异质性。
我们设计并将实施一项离散选择实验,以引出并量化多支血管CAD患者对血运重建和管理多支血管CAD的最佳药物治疗的偏好。多项逻辑混合效应模型和分层贝叶斯模型将用于模拟参与者的选择与属性及其不同水平之间的关联。属性的相对重要性将使用系数大小和边际替代率(MRS)进行评估,MRS是衡量在不同选项之间接受权衡意愿的指标。患者偏好的异质性将使用潜在类别分析进行评估。
本研究已获得卡尔加里大学联合健康研究伦理委员会的伦理批准。本研究的结果将为临床决策支持工具的开发提供信息,该工具将患者偏好与临床风险信息相结合,以支持患者与医疗服务提供者就多支血管CAD管理的最佳治疗进行讨论。