Maloney Ciaran M C, Atkin Andrew J, Beaumont Lee C, Budzynski-Seymour Emily, Warburton Victoria E
School of Education and Lifelong Learning, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Obes Rev. 2025 Oct;26(10):e13943. doi: 10.1111/obr.13943. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
Evidence suggests that targeting physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep in combination can benefit health and academic outcomes in young people. This scoping review aimed to describe the extent, range, and nature of combined movement behavior interventions and examine recruitment and effectiveness patterns in equity-denied populations. The following electronic databases were searched: Web of Science, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO. Gray literature was identified through ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, Google Scholar, and the British Library EThOS. Included studies were randomized or quasi-experimental interventions that modified two or more movement behaviors with the goal of affecting health-, behavioral-, or academic-related outcomes in children or adolescents. Peer-reviewed publications from scientific databases, master's level dissertations, and doctoral theses from gray literature searches in the English language were included. The behavior change technique taxonomy and PROGRESS-Plus framework were used to map intervention characteristics. Thirty studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were individual-level randomized controlled trials (40%), conducted in Europe (43%), and delivered in a school setting (77%). Physical activity and sedentary behavior were the predominant behaviors that were modified (83%). The most commonly used behavior change techniques included information about health consequences (67%) and social support [unspecified] (70%). All included studies focused on health-related outcome measures. Ten studies (33%) examined differential effects by PROGRESS-Plus subgroups. Future research should explore the value of movement behavior interventions across the breadth of non-health-related outcomes and include a stronger focus on differential effectiveness across population subgroups.
有证据表明,综合针对身体活动、久坐行为和睡眠对年轻人的健康和学业成绩有益。本综述旨在描述综合运动行为干预的范围、广度和性质,并研究被剥夺公平机会人群中的招募情况和有效性模式。检索了以下电子数据库:科学网、护理学与健康领域数据库、医学期刊数据库和心理学文摘数据库。通过ProQuest学位论文与全球博硕士论文数据库、谷歌学术和大英图书馆EThOS确定了灰色文献。纳入的研究为随机或准实验干预,这些干预改变了两种或更多的运动行为,目的是影响儿童或青少年与健康、行为或学业相关的结果。纳入了来自科学数据库的同行评审出版物、硕士水平的学位论文以及通过灰色文献检索获得的英文博士论文。使用行为改变技术分类法和PROGRESS-Plus框架来梳理干预特征。30项研究符合纳入标准。大多数研究是个体水平的随机对照试验(40%),在欧洲进行(43%),并在学校环境中实施(77%)。身体活动和久坐行为是主要被改变的行为(83%)。最常用的行为改变技术包括关于健康后果的信息(67%)和社会支持[未明确说明](70%)。所有纳入的研究都侧重于与健康相关的结果测量。10项研究(33%)按PROGRESS-Plus亚组检查了差异效应。未来的研究应探索运动行为干预在非健康相关结果方面的价值,并更加强调关注不同人群亚组的差异有效性。