Suppr超能文献

心脏再同步治疗中右心室起搏与固有传导之间最新电激动部位的一致性作为左心室导线位置的靶点。

Agreement on site of latest electrical activation between right ventricular pacing and intrinsic conduction as target for left ventricular lead position in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

作者信息

Bjerre Henrik Laurits, Nielsen Jens Cosedis, Pedersen Anders Lehmann Dahl, Gerdes Christian, Kristensen Jens, Jensen Jesper Møller, Nørgaard Bjarne Linde, Kronborg Mads Brix

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Heart Rhythm O2. 2025 Feb 21;6(5):566-575. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2025.02.006. eCollection 2025 May.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), studies indicate that targeting the left ventricular (LV) lead toward the site of latest electrical activation could improve clinical outcomes. Whether this site should be determined during right ventricular (RV) pacing or intrinsic conduction is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The study sought to investigate agreement between RV pacing and intrinsic conduction in identifying the site of latest electrical activation in patients undergoing CRT.

METHODS

During CRT implantation, we obtained pairwise measurements of the interval from QRS onset to local LV activation during intrinsic conduction (Q-LV) and the interval from the paced signal on the RV lead electrogram to the sensed local LV activation during RV pacing (RV-LV) in the basal, mid, and apical positions of eligible veins in patients randomized to the intervention arm in the DANISH-CRT (Does Electric Targeted LV Lead Positioning Improve Outcome in Patients With Heart Failure and Prolonged QRS) trial. Venous anatomy and final lead positions were verified by computed tomography.

RESULTS

We included 61 patients and measured intervals in 209 veins with 531segments. We found substantial agreement between RV-LV and Q-LV in identifying the latest activated vein (Cohen's weighted kappa coefficient 0.69 [95% confidence interval 0.62-0.76]). The RV lead was predominantly positioned toward the anteroseptal region and RV-LV favored a posterior vein more often than Q-LV. We found high intra- and interobserver reliability for RV-LV and Q-LV measurements.

CONCLUSION

There is substantial agreement between RV-LV during RV pacing and Q-LV during intrinsic conduction in identifying the optimal target for LV lead position in CRT. Still, the optimal target vein changed for one-third of patients as RV-LV favored a posterior target vein more often than Q-LV.

摘要

背景

在心脏再同步治疗(CRT)中,研究表明将左心室(LV)导线指向最晚电激动部位可改善临床结局。该部位应在右心室(RV)起搏还是自身传导期间确定尚不清楚。

目的

本研究旨在调查接受CRT的患者在识别最晚电激动部位时RV起搏与自身传导之间的一致性。

方法

在CRT植入过程中,我们对丹麦CRT(电靶向左心室导线定位是否能改善心力衰竭和QRS波延长患者的结局)试验中随机分配到干预组的患者,在合适静脉的基底部、中部和心尖部位置,获取自身传导期间从QRS波起始至局部LV激动的间期(Q-LV)以及RV起搏期间从RV导联心电图上的起搏信号至感知到的局部LV激动的间期(RV-LV)的成对测量值。通过计算机断层扫描验证静脉解剖结构和最终导线位置。

结果

我们纳入了61例患者,在209条静脉的531个节段测量了间期。我们发现RV-LV与Q-LV在识别最晚激活静脉方面有高度一致性(Cohen加权kappa系数为0.69[95%置信区间0.62-0.76])。RV导线主要定位于前间隔区域,且与Q-LV相比,RV-LV更倾向于后静脉。我们发现RV-LV和Q-LV测量具有较高的观察者内和观察者间可靠性。

结论

在CRT中识别LV导线位置的最佳靶点时,RV起搏期间的RV-LV与自身传导期间的Q-LV之间有高度一致性。尽管如此,三分之一患者的最佳靶点静脉发生了变化,因为与Q-LV相比,RV-LV更倾向于后靶点静脉。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4673/12147583/50025c05916d/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验