Tullie Sebastian, Asiri Ali, Acharjee Animesh, Moiemen Naiem S, Lord Janet M, Harrison Paul, Hazeldine Jon
Department of Inflammation and Ageing, School of Infection, Inflammation and Immunology, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
University Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK.
Cells. 2025 Jun 1;14(11):821. doi: 10.3390/cells14110821.
Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) released during tissue damage has attracted interest as a marker of patient outcomes. However, limited research has examined its predictive utility in thermally injured patients.
This study measured cfDNA concentrations across days 1, 3, 7, 14, and 28 post-burn in a total cohort of 98 adult patients with total body surface area (TBSA) burns ≥ 15% and healthy controls (HC). CfDNA concentrations in survivors (n = 79) versus non-survivors (n = 16) were compared and area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) models generated to evaluate cfDNA as a predictor of mortality.
Patient cfDNA levels were significantly elevated at all time points compared to HC. Positive correlations were identified between day 1 cfDNA concentrations (n = 95) and %TBSA (r = 0.413, < 0.0005), rBAUX (r = 0.365, = 0.0005) and SOFA (r = 0.391, = 0.0002). On day one, cfDNA levels showed good discriminatory ability for distinguishing between survivors and non-survivors (AUROC 0.778), with an optimal cut-off value of 446.37 pg/mL exhibiting a sensitivity of 0.80 and specificity of 0.70. Predictive models built on rBAUX, SOFA, interleukin(IL)-6 and IL-10 generated AUROC values of 0.733, 0.743, 0.472, and 0.688 respectively.
Major burns result in immediate and persistent cfDNA elevation, with concentrations on day one higher in non-survivors. Plasma cfDNA concentrations on day one post-burn showed good performance as a prognostic marker for mortality. CfDNA therefore represents a rapid objective measure that may be useful during acute burn assessments to aid mortality predictions.
组织损伤期间释放的游离DNA(cfDNA)作为患者预后的标志物已引起关注。然而,针对其在热损伤患者中的预测效用的研究有限。
本研究测量了98例成人患者(全身表面积(TBSA)烧伤≥15%)和健康对照(HC)在烧伤后第1、3、7、14和28天的cfDNA浓度。比较了幸存者(n = 79)和非幸存者(n = 16)的cfDNA浓度,并生成了受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)模型,以评估cfDNA作为死亡率预测指标的价值。
与HC相比,患者在所有时间点的cfDNA水平均显著升高。在第1天的cfDNA浓度(n = 95)与TBSA百分比(r = 0.413,<0.0005)、简化烧伤严重程度评分(rBAUX)(r = 0.365,= 0.000)和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分(r = 0.391,= 0.0002)之间发现正相关。在第1天,cfDNA水平对区分幸存者和非幸存者具有良好的鉴别能力(AUROC为0.778),最佳截断值为446.37 pg/mL,灵敏度为0.80,特异性为0.70。基于rBAUX、SOFA、白细胞介素(IL)-6和IL-10建立的预测模型产生的AUROC值分别为0.733、0.743、0.472和0.688。
严重烧伤导致cfDNA立即且持续升高,非幸存者在第1天的浓度更高。烧伤后第1天的血浆cfDNA浓度作为死亡率的预后标志物表现良好。因此,cfDNA代表了一种快速客观的测量方法,在急性烧伤评估期间可能有助于死亡率预测。