Pacheco Yelena M, Mann Ethan, Da Silveira Luiz F L, Bybee Seth M, Branham Marc A, McHugh Joseph V, Stanger-Hall Kathrin F
Department of Plant Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.
Systematic Entomology Laboratory, USDA-ARS, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 12;20(6):e0323722. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323722. eCollection 2025.
Insects use their antennae to collect environmental information. While the structural diversity of insect antennae is immediately obvious, the diversity of the minute antennal sensilla that interact with the environmental stimuli and translate them into sensory input, is largely unknown for many insect groups. This includes the beetle family Lampyridae, which includes nocturnal species that use bioluminescent signals during mate search, and diurnal species that rely exclusively on pheromones to identify and locate a potential mate. Relative to their bodysize, diurnal species tend to have larger antennae, and diurnal males have larger antennae than their females. It is generally assumed that antennal size reflects sensilla numbers, but this remains to be tested. We used Scanning Electron Microscopy to document the sensilla diversity of both males and females of three diurnal and four nocturnal firefly species, as well as total sensilla numbers, densities and their distribution along the antenna. We identified 14 sensilla morphotypes across the seven species, including 12 morphotypes that are new for Lampyridae. Based on their putative function we sorted all sensilla into two categories, mechanoreceptors and chemoreceptors. Mechanosensilla (3 morphotypes) were the most abundant and conserved sensilla across firefly species, and the distribution of chemosensilla (9 morphotypes) was unexpectedly variable across species. We hypothesized that the differences in mating signals between diurnal and nocturnal fireflies would be reflected in their chemosensilla counts or densities. As predicted, diurnal and nocturnal fireflies did not differ in their mechanosensilla counts or densities, nor did males and females. In contrast, firefly males had significantly more chemosensilla (and higher densities) than females and the interaction term (activity by sex) was also significant: diurnal males had significantly more chemosensilla than nocturnal males, highlighting the importance of pheromones for diurnal species. Based on a series of predictions, we also identified a pheromone sensilla candidate for each species that will facilitate functional testing in future studies.
昆虫利用触角收集环境信息。昆虫触角的结构多样性显而易见,但许多昆虫类群中与环境刺激相互作用并将其转化为感觉输入的微小触角感受器的多样性,在很大程度上还不为人知。这其中包括萤科甲虫,该科包含在求偶过程中使用生物发光信号的夜行性物种,以及完全依靠信息素识别和定位潜在配偶的日行性物种。相对于它们的体型,日行性物种往往有更大的触角,而且日行性雄性的触角比雌性的更大。一般认为触角大小反映了感受器的数量,但这仍有待验证。我们使用扫描电子显微镜记录了三种日行性和四种夜行性萤火虫物种的雄性和雌性的感受器多样性,以及感受器总数、密度及其在触角上的分布。我们在这七个物种中识别出14种感受器形态类型,包括12种萤科新的形态类型。基于其假定功能,我们将所有感受器分为两类,机械感受器和化学感受器。机械感受器(3种形态类型)是萤火虫物种中数量最多且最保守的感受器,而化学感受器(9种形态类型)的分布在不同物种间出人意料地多变。我们假设日行性和夜行性萤火虫交配信号的差异会反映在它们化学感受器的数量或密度上。正如预测的那样,日行性和夜行性萤火虫在机械感受器的数量或密度上没有差异,雄性和雌性之间也没有差异。相比之下,萤火虫雄性的化学感受器(以及密度)显著多于雌性,并且交互项(活动×性别)也很显著:日行性雄性的化学感受器显著多于夜行性雄性,这突出了信息素对日行性物种的重要性。基于一系列预测,我们还为每个物种确定了一种信息素感受器候选类型,这将便于未来研究中的功能测试。