Suppr超能文献

三种语言顺序性命名障碍治疗中的跨语言互动:来自一名失语症三语者的证据。

Cross-language interaction during sequential anomia treatment in three languages: Evidence from a trilingual person with aphasia.

作者信息

Peñaloza Claudia, Marte Manuel Jose, Billot Anne, Kiran Swathi

机构信息

Department of Cognition, Development and Educational Psychology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Cognition and Brain Plasticity Unit, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.

Center for Brain Recovery, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Cortex. 2025 Jun 4;189:107-130. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2025.05.017.

Abstract

Language rehabilitation research has reported mixed evidence in bilinguals with aphasia suggesting that therapy can benefit the treated language alone or additionally result in cross-language generalization to the untreated language, while cross-language interference effects are less common. However, treatment effects in multilinguals with aphasia (MWA) have been less frequently investigated, and examining cross-language interactions during therapy may help to better understand their treatment response in each language. This study reports on P1, a trilingual person with severe aphasia with extensive damage to cortical language regions and the basal ganglia, who received sequential semantic-based treatment for anomia in her L3 French, L1 Spanish and L2 English. Overall, significant treatment gains in the treated language were restricted to her L3 French, the weakest language, while her treatment response was limited across languages likely due to severe language impairment and extensive damage to the language processing network. Cross-language generalization effects were absent and P1 showed cross-language interference in her L2 English during treatment in her L3 French. Cross-language intrusions were observed between languages, more frequently in her L2 English (the least available language in treatment) than in her L1 Spanish (the strongest language). The absence of cross-language generalization and presence of cross-language interference in P1 were likely due to damage in the basal ganglia and executive deficits reflecting damage to the language control network. Severe language processing and language control impairments can hinder the balance between activation and inhibition mechanisms necessary to support response to language treatment in MWA.

摘要

语言康复研究表明,失语症双语患者的治疗效果不一,这表明治疗可能仅对接受治疗的语言有益,或者额外产生跨语言泛化到未接受治疗的语言,而跨语言干扰效应则不太常见。然而,对失语症多语患者(MWA)的治疗效果研究较少,在治疗过程中检查跨语言交互可能有助于更好地了解他们对每种语言的治疗反应。本研究报告了P1,一名患有严重失语症的三语者,其皮层语言区域和基底神经节受到广泛损伤,她接受了针对其第三语言法语、第一语言西班牙语和第二语言英语的命名障碍的基于语义的序贯治疗。总体而言,治疗语言的显著治疗效果仅限于她最弱的语言——第三语言法语,而她的治疗反应在不同语言中有限,这可能是由于严重的语言障碍和语言处理网络的广泛损伤。跨语言泛化效应不存在,并且P1在第三语言法语治疗期间在其第二语言英语中表现出跨语言干扰。在不同语言之间观察到了跨语言侵入,在她的第二语言英语(治疗中最不常用的语言)中比在她的第一语言西班牙语(最强的语言)中更频繁。P1中跨语言泛化的缺失和跨语言干扰的存在可能是由于基底神经节的损伤和反映语言控制网络损伤的执行缺陷。严重的语言处理和语言控制障碍可能会阻碍支持失语症多语患者对语言治疗反应所需的激活和抑制机制之间的平衡。

相似文献

3
Non-pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 29;5(5):CD015067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015067.pub2.
4
The TIC-TAC Method: A Communication Training for a Person With Aphasia and a Caregiver.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jul-Aug;60(4):e70065. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70065.
6
Positive effects of speech and language therapy group interventions in primary progressive aphasia: A systematic review.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Sep-Oct;59(5):1832-1849. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13031. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
10
A Comparison of Item Acquisition and Response Generalization for Semantic Versus Phonological Treatment of Aphasia.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2025 Apr 8;68(4):1821-1836. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00304. Epub 2025 Feb 26.

本文引用的文献

1
A Meta-Analysis of Anomia Treatment in Bilingual Aphasia: Within- and Cross-Language Generalization and Predictors of the Treatment Outcomes.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 May 7;67(5):1558-1600. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00026. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
2
Multilevel factors predict treatment response following semantic feature-based intervention in bilingual aphasia.
Biling (Camb Engl). 2024 Mar;27(2):246-262. doi: 10.1017/s1366728923000391. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
3
Cross-language generalization of language treatment in multilingual people with post-stroke aphasia: A meta-analysis.
Brain Lang. 2023 Nov;246:105326. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2023.105326. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
4
Rehabilitating an attrited language in a bilingual person with aphasia.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2023 Mar 4;37(3):272-290. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2022.2052966. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
5
Verbal fluency as a measure of lexical access and cognitive control in bilingual persons with aphasia.
Aphasiology. 2020;34(11):1341-1362. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2020.1759774. Epub 2020 May 14.
8
The influence of prestroke proficiency on poststroke lexical-semantic performance in bilingual aphasia.
Aphasiology. 2020;34(10):1223-1240. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2019.1666082. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
10
Statistical analysis in Small-N Designs: using linear mixed-effects modeling for evaluating intervention effectiveness.
Aphasiology. 2019;33(1):1-30. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2018.1454884. Epub 2018 Mar 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验