Lehmann Sylvain, Gabelle Audrey, Duchiron Marie, Busto Germain, Morchikh Mehdi, Delaby Constance, Hirtz Christophe, Mondesert Etienne, Cristol Jean-Paul, Barnier-Figue Genevieve, Perrein Florence, Turpinat Cédric, Jurici Snejana, Bennys Karim
LBPC-PPC, Université de Montpellier, INM INSERM, IRMB CHU de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Université de Montpellier, Memory Research and Resources Center, Department of Neurology, Inserm INM, F-34000, Montpellier, France.
EBioMedicine. 2025 Jun 12;117:105805. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105805.
Early detection of brain amyloidosis (Aβ+) is crucial for diagnosing Alzheimer' disease (AD) and optimizing patient management, especially in light of emerging treatments. While plasma biomarkers are promising, their combined diagnostic value through specific ratios remains underexplored. In this study, we assess the diagnostic accuracy of plasma pTau isoform (pTau181 and pTau217) to Aβ42 ratios in detecting Aβ+ status.
This study included 423 participants from the multicenter prospective ALZAN cohort, recruited for cognitive complaints. Aβ+ status was determined using cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers. The confirmatory cohort comprises 1176 patient samples from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), with Aβ+ status determined by positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Plasma biomarkers (pTau181, pTau217, Aβ40, Aβ42) were measured using immunoassays and mass spectrometry, with specific ratios calculated. In the ALZAN cohort, the impact of confounding factors such as age, renal function, ApoE 4 status, body mass index, and the delay between blood collection and processing was also evaluated to assess their influence on biomarker concentrations and diagnostic performance. The primary outcome was the diagnostic performance of plasma biomarkers and their ratios for detecting Aβ+ status. Secondary outcomes in the ALZAN cohort included the proportion of patients classified as low, intermediate, or high risk for Aβ+ using a two-cutoff approach.
In ALZAN the pTau181/Aβ42 ratio matched the diagnostic performance of pTau217 (AUC of 0.911 (0.882-0.940) vs. 0.909 (0.879-0.939), P = 0.85). The pTau217/Aβ42 ratio demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy, with an AUC of 0.927 (0.900-0.954). Both ratios effectively mitigated confounding factors, such as variations in renal function, and were also efficient in identifying Aβ+ status in individuals with early cognitive decline. Diagnostic accuracy of ratios vs. individual measurement was confirmed in the ADNI cohort. In ALZAN, using two-cutoff workflows with pTau217/Aβ42 instead of pTau217 alone reduced the intermediate-risk zone from ∼16% to ∼8%, enhancing stratification for clinical decision-making.
The pTau217/Aβ42 ratio demonstrated improved diagnostic performance for detecting Aβ+ compared to individual biomarkers, potentially reducing diagnostic uncertainty. These findings suggest that plasma biomarker ratios could be useful; however, further validation in independent and diverse clinical settings is necessary before broader clinical implementation.
Fondation Research Alzheimer (ALZAN projet), AXA Mécénat Santé (INTERVAL Project), Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FRM, team Proteinopathies).
脑淀粉样变性(Aβ+)的早期检测对于阿尔茨海默病(AD)的诊断和优化患者管理至关重要,尤其是鉴于新出现的治疗方法。虽然血浆生物标志物很有前景,但它们通过特定比率的联合诊断价值仍未得到充分探索。在本研究中,我们评估了血浆pTau异构体(pTau181和pTau217)与Aβ42的比率在检测Aβ+状态方面的诊断准确性。
本研究纳入了来自多中心前瞻性ALZAN队列的423名因认知主诉而招募的参与者。使用脑脊液(CSF)生物标志物确定Aβ+状态。验证队列包括来自阿尔茨海默病神经影像倡议(ADNI)的1176份患者样本,通过正电子发射断层扫描(PET)成像确定Aβ+状态。使用免疫测定和质谱法测量血浆生物标志物(pTau181、pTau217、Aβ40、Aβ42),并计算特定比率。在ALZAN队列中,还评估了年龄、肾功能、ApoE 4状态、体重指数以及采血与处理之间的延迟等混杂因素的影响,以评估它们对生物标志物浓度和诊断性能的影响。主要结果是血浆生物标志物及其比率检测Aβ+状态的诊断性能。ALZAN队列中的次要结果包括使用双临界值方法将患者分类为Aβ+低、中或高风险的比例。
在ALZAN中,pTau181/Aβ42比率与pTau217的诊断性能相当(曲线下面积[AUC]为0.911[0.882 - 0.940]对0.909[0.879 - 0.939],P = 0.85)。pTau217/Aβ42比率显示出最高的诊断准确性,AUC为0.927(0.900 - 0.954)。这两个比率都有效地减轻了诸如肾功能变化等混杂因素的影响,并且在识别早期认知衰退个体的Aβ+状态方面也很有效。比率与个体测量的诊断准确性在ADNI队列中得到了证实。在ALZAN中,使用pTau217/Aβ42的双临界值工作流程而非单独使用pTau217,将中间风险区从约16%降至约8%,增强了临床决策的分层。
与单个生物标志物相比,pTau217/Aβ42比率在检测Aβ+方面表现出更高的诊断性能,可能降低诊断不确定性。这些发现表明血浆生物标志物比率可能有用;然而,在更广泛的临床应用之前,需要在独立和多样的临床环境中进行进一步验证。
阿尔茨海默研究基金会(ALZAN项目)、安盛健康慈善基金(INTERVAL项目)、医学研究基金会(FRM,蛋白质病团队)