Evans Alexandra H, Ciruela-Jardí Marc, Rea William, Keegan Bradley M, Levinstein Marjorie R, Bonifazi Alessandro, Cao Jianjing, Jackson Shelley N, Shi Lei, Casajuana-Martin Nil, Cai Ning-Sheng, Casadó Vicent, Earley Christopher J, Newman Amy H, Michaelides Michael, Pardo Leonardo, Moreno Estefanía, Ferré Sergi
Integrative Neurobiology Section, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Laboratory of Molecular Neuropharmacology, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biomedicine, Faculty of Biology and Institute of Biomedicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Laboratory of Computational Medicine, Biostatistics Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.
Pharmacol Res. 2025 Aug;218:107826. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2025.107826. Epub 2025 Jun 14.
Several dopaminergic compounds, including the clinically used pramipexole, are labelled as preferential dopamine D receptor (DR) agonists based on their moderately higher affinity for the DR versus other D-like receptor subtypes. In rodents, these compounds typically produce locomotor depression with low doses and locomotor activation with higher doses, which has been assumed to be mediated by presynaptic DRs and postsynaptic striatal DRs, respectively. However, studies with selective pharmacological and genetic blockade of each dopamine receptor subtype suggest opposite roles. We address this apparent conundrum by performing a comprehensive in vitro, in vivo and ex vivo pharmacological comparison of several preferential DR agonists. Their differential properties reveal that their locomotor activating effects in mice are dependent on the striatal postsynaptic DRs forming heteromers with DRs, via their ability to potentiate β-arrestin recruitment by the DR in the DR-DR heteromer. The results also indicate that the locomotor depressant effects are largely dependent on their ability to activate presynaptic DRs. More broadly, it is demonstrated that locomotor activity in mice depends on β-arrestin recruitment by the DR in the striatal DR-DR heteromer. These results can have implications for the treatment of L-dopa-induced dyskinesia and Restless Legs Syndrome.
包括临床使用的普拉克索在内的几种多巴胺能化合物,因其对多巴胺 D 受体(DR)的亲和力相较于其他 D 样受体亚型略高,而被标记为选择性多巴胺 D 受体激动剂。在啮齿动物中,这些化合物通常在低剂量时产生运动抑制,在高剂量时产生运动激活,一般认为分别是由突触前 DR 和突触后纹状体 DR 介导的。然而,对每种多巴胺受体亚型进行选择性药理和基因阻断的研究表明情况相反。我们通过对几种选择性 DR 激动剂进行全面的体外、体内和离体药理学比较来解决这一明显的难题。它们的不同特性表明,它们在小鼠中的运动激活作用取决于纹状体突触后 DR 与 DR 形成异聚体,这是通过它们增强 DR-DR 异聚体中 DR 募集β-抑制蛋白的能力实现的。结果还表明,运动抑制作用很大程度上取决于它们激活突触前 DR 的能力。更广泛地说,已证明小鼠的运动活动取决于纹状体 DR-DR 异聚体中 DR 募集β-抑制蛋白的情况。这些结果可能对左旋多巴诱导的运动障碍和不宁腿综合征的治疗有影响。