Zhu Ling, Xie Zhiqiang, Liu Yun, Yang Lihong, Tan Jing, Cheng Wei, Cai Zhongliang, Du Qingyun, Zhang Shuliang
College of Earth Sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China.
School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2025 Aug 15;990:179889. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179889. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
Over the past two decades, global climate change and rapid urbanization have led to increasingly frequent and severe urban flood disasters in the southeastern monsoon region of China. Urban form has emerged as a crucial means of mitigating flood risks. However, the capacity of different urban form structures to cope with uncertain flood disturbances remains unclear. In response, this study takes 137 cities in the southeast monsoon region of China as an example to construct an Urban Form Resilience Evaluation Framework under Flood Disturbance (FD-UFREF) that covers the three stages of disaster-incubating space, disaster-bearing space, and disaster-response space, as well as the cross combination of ecological, physical, spatial, and functional urban form elements. Based on AHP and improved spatiotemporal entropy weight method, indicator weights are determined to evaluate FD-UFR of cities from 2000 to 2020. Spatiotemporal evolution patterns and driving factors of FD-UFR are explored through spatial analysis and geographic detectors. Key findings include: (1) Urban form resilience shows an overall upward trend, with an average increase of 10.89 %, but significant spatial disparities persist, following a spatial pattern of "high in the west, low in the east" and an "inverted U-shape" from north to south; (2) Disaster-incubating spaces have consistently exhibited higher resilience, with the most substantial improvement observed in disaster-response spaces. However, disaster-bearing spaces remain structurally weak, and some cities show an unbalanced resilience structure of "weak defense, strengthened response"; (3) FD-UFR demonstrates strong positive spatial clustering, with high-value clusters concentrated in the southwest and expanding low-value zones forming vulnerability belts along the eastern coast; (4) Urban centrality, impervious surface ratio, and terrain undulation are the dominant drivers of FD-UFR spatial heterogeneity. Additionally, the Urban Functional Resilience Index (REP)-constructed using extreme precipitation events and nighttime light data-was introduced for cross-validation of the FD-UFREF. The high spatial and statistical consistency between FD-UFR and REP (R = 0.661) confirms the robustness and applicability of the proposed framework. The findings provide theoretical and practical support for improving flood resilience planning in southeastern monsoon-affected urban regions in China.
在过去二十年中,全球气候变化和快速城市化导致中国东南季风区城市洪涝灾害日益频繁且严重。城市形态已成为减轻洪水风险的关键手段。然而,不同城市形态结构应对不确定洪水干扰的能力仍不明确。为此,本研究以中国东南季风区的137个城市为例,构建了洪水干扰下的城市形态韧性评估框架(FD-UFREF),该框架涵盖灾害孕育空间、承灾空间和灾害响应空间三个阶段,以及生态、物理、空间和功能城市形态要素的交叉组合。基于层次分析法和改进的时空熵权法确定指标权重,对2000年至2020年城市的FD-UFR进行评估。通过空间分析和地理探测器探索FD-UFR的时空演变模式和驱动因素。主要研究结果包括:(1)城市形态韧性总体呈上升趋势,平均增幅为10.89%,但空间差异显著,呈现“西高东低”的空间格局和自北向南的“倒U形”;(2)灾害孕育空间的韧性始终较高,灾害响应空间的改善最为显著。然而,承灾空间在结构上仍然薄弱,一些城市呈现出“防御薄弱、响应增强”的韧性结构失衡;(3)FD-UFR呈现出较强的正空间集聚性,高值聚类集中在西南部,沿东部海岸扩展的低值区形成脆弱带;(4)城市中心性、不透水表面比率和地形起伏是FD-UFR空间异质性的主要驱动因素。此外,引入了利用极端降水事件和夜间灯光数据构建的城市功能韧性指数(REP)对FD-UFREF进行交叉验证。FD-UFR与REP之间较高的空间和统计一致性(R = 0.661)证实了所提框架的稳健性和适用性。研究结果为改善中国东南季风影响城市地区的洪水韧性规划提供了理论和实践支持。