Stolnicu Ana, Ikonomi Nensi, Eckhardt-Bellmann Peter, Kraus Johann M, Kestler Hans A
Institute of Medical Systems Biology, Ulm University, 89069 Ulm, Germany.
Brief Bioinform. 2025 May 1;26(3). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbaf269.
Signalling entropy measures the uncertainty or randomness in the signalling pathways of a biological system. It reflects the complexity and variability of protein interactions and can indicate how information is processed within cells. Higher signalling entropy often indicates a more dynamic and adaptive state, whereas lower entropy may imply a more stable and less responsive condition. Estimating signalling entropy has become a valuable method for studying and understanding the complexity of biological processes. This measure has the potential to shed valuable insights into various phenomena, including the mechanisms behind cell fate decisions, drug resistance, and disease progression. To examine the molecular changes within a system, signalling entropy is quantified through the integration of expression measurements and protein interaction networks. Experimental and computational issues, such as false positives and additional noise, can all compromise the accuracy of protein interaction networks. Correction methods can be used to mitigate spurious results, correct for experimental bias, and integrate data from multiple sources. However, to date, the effect of such approaches on entropy calculations, together with the impact of different underlying networks, has yet to be evaluated.
Here, we investigate how the topology of distinct protein interaction networks can alter the entropy calculation. We examine the entropy derived from different protein interaction networks. Additionally, we systematically evaluate different correction strategies, outlining their benefits and drawbacks along with identifying the most effective approaches for specific types of data and biological scenarios. This protocol outlines how to optimize the reliability of entropy calculations and ultimately leads to a deeper comprehension of biological processes and disease mechanisms.
信号熵衡量生物系统信号通路中的不确定性或随机性。它反映了蛋白质相互作用的复杂性和变异性,并能表明细胞内信息是如何处理的。较高的信号熵通常表明一种更动态和适应性更强的状态,而较低的熵可能意味着一种更稳定、反应性更低的状态。估计信号熵已成为研究和理解生物过程复杂性的一种有价值的方法。这种测量方法有可能为各种现象提供有价值的见解,包括细胞命运决定、耐药性和疾病进展背后的机制。为了研究系统内的分子变化,通过整合表达测量和蛋白质相互作用网络来量化信号熵。实验和计算问题,如假阳性和额外噪声,都可能损害蛋白质相互作用网络的准确性。校正方法可用于减轻虚假结果、校正实验偏差以及整合来自多个来源的数据。然而,迄今为止,此类方法对熵计算的影响以及不同基础网络的影响尚未得到评估。
在这里,我们研究不同蛋白质相互作用网络的拓扑结构如何改变熵计算。我们检查从不同蛋白质相互作用网络得出的熵。此外,我们系统地评估不同的校正策略,概述它们的优点和缺点,并确定针对特定类型的数据和生物学场景最有效的方法。本方案概述了如何优化熵计算的可靠性,并最终加深对生物过程和疾病机制的理解。