Gustavsson Martina E, Juth Niklas, von Schreeb Johan, Arnberg Filip K
Global Disaster Medicine, Health Needs and Response, Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Equity & Health policy (EHP), Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2512677. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2512677. Epub 2025 Jun 19.
The consequences of moral challenges among healthcare workers (HCWs) have been increasingly recognized. To date, however, there is limited knowledge about the predictors of and associations between moral distress, moral residue, and other psychological consequences among HCWs working in a pandemic context. We aimed to assess the levels of, and the associations between HCWs' experiences of moral distress and moral residue with traumatic stress, burnout, and general psychological distress, and evaluate the role of empathic and compassion aspects for these outcomes, while adjusting for demographic and professional factors. This is a cross-sectional study of 6551 Swedish HCWs participating in a survey during the COVID-19 pandemic, in the autumn of 2020. The survey included questions related to moral challenges, moral distress and residue, and self-report scales for general psychological distress (GHQ-5), traumatic stress (ITQ), compassion satisfaction and fatigue (ProQoL), empathic ability (B-IRI), and burnout (SMBQ). There were strong associations between moral challenges and moral distress and residue. There were also clear associations between moral distress and residue and psychological distress scales. Empathic ability, compassion fatigue, and compassion satisfaction were associated with moral residue whereas compassion satisfaction was not associated with moral distress. Demographic and professional predictors included gender, age, and occupational role. No interactions between moral challenges and empathic ability were found for moral distress or residue. Moral distress and moral residue share some variance with both general and stress-related psychological distress; however, moral distress and residue are both theoretically and empirically distinct outcomes of moral challenges as compared to other established psychological consequences of occupational stress. Empathic ability was associated with moral distress, but not with moral residue. Moving forward, longitudinal research is needed to better understand the interplay among moral aspects relevant to HCWs.
医护人员面临的道德挑战所带来的后果已得到越来越多的认识。然而,迄今为止,对于在大流行背景下工作的医护人员中,道德困扰、道德残留与其他心理后果之间的预测因素及关联的了解有限。我们旨在评估医护人员的道德困扰和道德残留经历与创伤应激、职业倦怠和一般心理困扰之间的水平及关联,并在调整人口统计学和职业因素的同时,评估共情和同情方面对这些结果的作用。这是一项对6551名瑞典医护人员进行的横断面研究,这些医护人员于2020年秋季在新冠疫情期间参与了一项调查。该调查包括与道德挑战、道德困扰和残留相关的问题,以及用于评估一般心理困扰(GHQ-5)、创伤应激(ITQ)、同情满意度和疲劳感(ProQoL)、共情能力(B-IRI)和职业倦怠(SMBQ)的自我报告量表。道德挑战与道德困扰和残留之间存在强烈关联。道德困扰和残留与心理困扰量表之间也存在明显关联。共情能力、同情疲劳和同情满意度与道德残留相关,而同情满意度与道德困扰无关。人口统计学和职业预测因素包括性别、年龄和职业角色。在道德困扰或残留方面,未发现道德挑战与共情能力之间存在相互作用。道德困扰和道德残留与一般心理困扰和与压力相关的心理困扰都有一些共同的方差;然而,与职业压力的其他既定心理后果相比,道德困扰和残留从理论和实证角度来看都是道德挑战的不同结果。共情能力与道德困扰相关,但与道德残留无关。展望未来,需要进行纵向研究,以更好地理解与医护人员相关的道德方面之间的相互作用。