Wang Xiaohui, Ji Taoyun, Liu Maomao, Wang Xiaofei, Yang Zhixian, Wang Sanmei, Zou Liping, Qin Jiong, Ren Xiaotun, Ren Liankun, Jin Liri, Shi Jie, Peng Dantao, Chen Kui, Dai Jindong, Zhang Nan, Wang Jun, Song Tianyu, Fang Fang, Zhang Yuehua, Wang Qun
Department of Neurology Beijing Children's Hospital Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health Beijing China.
Department of Pediatrics Peking University First Hospital Beijing China.
Pediatr Investig. 2025 Mar 11;9(2):172-180. doi: 10.1002/ped4.12463. eCollection 2025 Jun.
Perampanel (PER) is used less extensively in children than in adults. Currently, there is a lack of data from PER clinical studies with large sample sizes in Chinese children and adolescents with epilepsy, especially those with refractory epilepsy.
To evaluate the effectiveness, retention, and safety of PER in the treatment of children and adolescents with epilepsy in China.
This was a multicenter, prospective, observational study. Children and adolescents with epilepsy who received PER as adjunctive therapy were included. The primary effectiveness endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency after 6 months of treatment compared to baseline. The secondary effectiveness endpoints included retention and seizure-free rates. The safety outcome was the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).
A total of 240 patients with epilepsy were enrolled in the study. Prior to initiating PER treatment, approximately 87.9% of them took two or more antiseizure medications. After a 6-month treatment regimen with PER, 70.4% of the patients experienced a reduced seizure frequency of at least 50%, and 22.1% achieved complete seizure freedom. The retention rate was 90.2%. TEAEs were reported by 89 patients, leading to the discontinuation of PER in seven cases. No severe TEAEs were observed in this study.
Under routine clinical conditions, PER demonstrated good effectiveness and retention in Chinese children with epilepsy, particularly in those with refractory epilepsy.
与成人相比,吡仑帕奈(PER)在儿童中的使用范围较窄。目前,缺乏关于中国癫痫儿童和青少年,尤其是难治性癫痫患者的大样本PER临床研究数据。
评估PER在中国癫痫儿童和青少年治疗中的有效性、耐受性和安全性。
这是一项多中心、前瞻性观察性研究。纳入接受PER作为辅助治疗的癫痫儿童和青少年。主要有效性终点是治疗6个月后与基线相比癫痫发作频率降低≥50%的患者比例。次要有效性终点包括耐受性和无癫痫发作率。安全性结果是治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAE)的发生率。
共有240例癫痫患者纳入研究。在开始PER治疗前,约87.9%的患者服用两种或更多抗癫痫药物。经过6个月的PER治疗方案后,70.4%的患者癫痫发作频率降低至少50%,22.1%的患者实现完全无癫痫发作。耐受性为90.2%。89例患者报告了TEAE,7例导致PER停药。本研究未观察到严重TEAE。
在常规临床条件下,PER在中国癫痫儿童中显示出良好的有效性和耐受性,尤其是在难治性癫痫儿童中。