Todderud Julia E, Nugraha Hans K, Kelly Michael P, Pahys Joshua, Shah Suken, Fletcher Nicholas, Newton Peter O, Sucato Daniel, Yaszay Burt, Larson A Noelle
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Washington State University College of Medicine, Spokane, WA, USA.
Spine Deform. 2025 Jun 20. doi: 10.1007/s43390-025-01134-8.
Our study aims to evaluate the impact of rod diameter and material on sagittal plane correction and reoperation. We hypothesize larger diameter rods would improve the sagittal plane alignment without increasing complications or progression of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK).
Data were reviewed from consecutive series of Lenke 1-4 AIS patients enrolled in a multicenter registry between 2010 and 2019 with minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients who underwent PSF with 5 common rod types (5.5 or 6.0 cobalt chrome, 5.5 stainless steel, 5.5 or 6.0 titanium rods) were evaluated. Other rod types/diameters were excluded from this study.
1348 patients treated by 29 surgeons at 13 centers met inclusion criteria. 42 had 5.5 titanium rods (3%), 651 patients had 5.5 cobalt chrome (48%), 586 had 5.5 stainless steel (43%), 46 had 6.0 titanium (3%), and 23 had 6.0 cobalt chrome (2%). Preoperatively there was no difference in curve magnitude or flexibility. Patients that received stiffer rods were older and taller. At 2 years, the 5.5 stainless steel patients had the greatest major curve correction (62.5%) while 5.5 titanium patients had the lowest correction (54.2%) (whole cohort p < 0.001). At 2-year follow-up there was most improved T2-T12 kyphosis in the 6.0 titanium group (+ 6.5°), and least in the 5.5 titanium group (-3.2°) (p = 0.014). T5-T12 changes were greatest in the 6.0 titanium group (+ 3.9°) and lowest in the 5.5 titanium group (-6.7°) (p < 0.001). PJK increased most in the 5.5 titanium cohort (+ 4.0) and least in the 6.0 cobalt chrome cohort (+ 0.8) (p < 0.001). Complication rates were highest in the 5.5 stainless steel patients (12.6%) while rates of reoperations were highest in the 5.5 cobalt chrome cohort (n = 9, 1.4%).
In this retrospective review of patients undergoing PSF with rods of varying size and materials, there was evidence of better restoration of T5-T12 kyphosis with stiffer/larger rods without increased risk of PJK progression.
我们的研究旨在评估棒材直径和材料对矢状面矫正及再次手术的影响。我们假设较大直径的棒材可改善矢状面排列,且不会增加近端交界性后凸(PJK)的并发症或进展风险。
回顾了2010年至2019年期间纳入多中心登记处的连续系列Lenke 1-4型青少年特发性脊柱侧弯(AIS)患者的数据,随访时间至少为2年。对接受5种常见棒材类型(5.5或6.0钴铬合金、5.5不锈钢、5.5或6.0钛棒)后路脊柱融合(PSF)的患者进行评估。本研究排除了其他棒材类型/直径。
13个中心的29名外科医生治疗的1348例患者符合纳入标准。42例患者使用5.5钛棒(3%),651例患者使用5.5钴铬合金棒(48%),586例患者使用5.5不锈钢棒(43%),46例患者使用6.0钛棒(3%),23例患者使用6.0钴铬合金棒(2%)。术前,曲线大小或柔韧性无差异。接受较硬棒材的患者年龄更大、身高更高。2年时,5.5不锈钢棒材组患者的主曲线矫正最大(62.5%),而5.5钛棒材组患者的矫正最小(54.2%)(全队列p<0.001)。在2年随访时,6.0钛棒材组的T2-T12后凸改善最大(+6.5°),5.5钛棒材组最小(-3.2°)(p = 0.014)。T5-T12变化在6.0钛棒材组最大(+3.9°),在5.5钛棒材组最小(-6.7°)(p<0.001)。PJK在5.5钛棒材队列中增加最多(+4.0),在6.0钴铬合金队列中增加最少(+0.8)(p<0.001)。5.5不锈钢棒材组患者的并发症发生率最高(12.6%),而5.5钴铬合金队列的再次手术率最高(n = 9,1.4%)。
在这项对接受不同尺寸和材料棒材PSF的患者的回顾性研究中,有证据表明使用较硬/较大直径的棒材能更好地恢复T5-T12后凸,且不会增加PJK进展的风险。