Hegde Naveen Chandrashekar, Mishra Archana, V Divya, Maiti Rituparna, Hota Debasish, Srinivasan Anand
Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2025 Jun 20;29(1):96. doi: 10.1007/s11916-025-01411-1.
Chronic pain conditions are among the leading causes of years lost to disability. Low Dose Naltrexone (LDN) has anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties. LDN, by blocking Toll-Like Receptors (TLR), prevents central sensitization and conversion of acute pain state to a state of chronic pain. This meta-analysis compared LDN's effectiveness in chronic pain syndromes based on published randomized trials.
Seven studies were included after a systematic search and screening from PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and clinical trial registries. The efficacy outcome analyzed was the standardized mean difference (SMD), the Cohen's d, of change in pain scores between LDN and the comparator drugs using the random-effect model. Subgroup analyses by condition type and comparator were performed to analyze the effect of LDN. Adverse events were evaluated using incidence rate ratio(IRR), publication bias by funnel plot, risk of bias by Cochrane Risk of Bias tool version 2.0, and certainty of evidence by GRADE evaluation.
LDN did not show a significant difference in pain response compared to control groups [d = -0.11 (95%CI -0.96 to 0.74); P = 0.31]. In fibromyalgia, LDN had improvement compared to placebo [d = -0.34 (95%CI -0.62 to -0.06); P = 0.0186]. Against active comparators, LDN had no difference [d = 0.67 (95% CI -4.69 to 6.02); P = 0.35]. Adverse events were increased with LDN compared to placebo [IRR = 1.4 (95% CI 1.12 to 1.75); P = 0.0026] but comparable to active comparators [IRR = 0.55 (95% CI 0.04 to 7.31); P = 0.65].
LDN is better than placebo in fibromyalgia pain management, and LDN is similar to active controls in chronic pain management.
CRD42024511451.
慢性疼痛状况是导致残疾年数的主要原因之一。低剂量纳曲酮(LDN)具有抗炎和免疫调节特性。LDN通过阻断 Toll 样受体(TLR),可防止中枢敏化以及急性疼痛状态转变为慢性疼痛状态。本荟萃分析基于已发表的随机试验,比较了LDN在慢性疼痛综合征中的有效性。
通过对PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Cochrane以及临床试验注册库进行系统检索和筛选,纳入了七项研究。分析的疗效结果是使用随机效应模型得出的LDN与对照药物之间疼痛评分变化的标准化平均差(SMD)即科恩d值。按病情类型和对照进行亚组分析,以分析LDN的效果。使用发病率比(IRR)评估不良事件,通过漏斗图评估发表偏倚,使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具2.0评估偏倚风险,并通过GRADE评估证据的确定性。
与对照组相比,LDN在疼痛反应方面未显示出显著差异[d = -0.11(95%CI -0.96至0.74);P = 0.31]。在纤维肌痛中,与安慰剂相比,LDN有改善[d = -0.34(95%CI -0.62至-0.06);P = 0.0186]。与活性对照相比,LDN无差异[d = 0.67(95%CI -4.69至6.02);P = 0.35]。与安慰剂相比LDN的不良事件增加[IRR = 1.4(95%CI 1.12至1.75);P = 0.0026]但与活性对照相当[IRR = 0.55(95%CI 0.04至7.31);P = 0.65]。
在纤维肌痛疼痛管理中,LDN优于安慰剂;在慢性疼痛管理中,LDN与活性对照相似。
PROSPERO注册号:CRD42024511451。