Kushnir Alexander, Barbhaiya Chirag R, Jankelson Lior, Holmes Douglas, Aizer Anthony, Park David, Bernstein Scott, Spinelli Michael A, Garber Leonid, Yang Felix, Rosinski Elizabeth, Chinitz Larry A
Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Electrophysiology, NYU Langone Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA.
Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, USA.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025 Jun 20. doi: 10.1007/s10840-025-02089-6.
Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is the cornerstone of radiofrequency (RF) ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) and PV reconnection is a common cause of recurrent AF. The relationship between PV ostial wall thickness (WT) and durable PV isolation is a matter of ongoing investigation. Additionally, the relationship between catheter impedance and WT is not well understood. We studied the relationship between PV ostial WT, ablation lesion metrics, and PV reconnection.
16 patients were identified who underwent an initial and redo AF ablation procedure and had a cardiac CTA analyzed using ADAS-3D imaging software performed prior to the initial ablation. Ablation lesion metrics from the initial ablation procedure were collected from the electroanatomic mapping software. Reconnected and isolated PV were identified based on electroanatomic mapping data collected at the redo AF ablation procedure. Patients with reconnected PV exhibited thicker left atrial walls (1.4 mm vs 1.2 mm, P < 0.05) and reconnected veins exhibited thicker ostial walls (1.7 mm, vs 1.5 mm, P < 0.05). LA volume, number of ablation lesions, and ablation lesion time were not significantly different between reconnected and isolated PV. Impedance drop during ablation was greater in patients with reconnected PV compared to patients with isolated PV (- 9.0 Ω vs - 6.6 Ω, P < 0.05). There was no correlation between PV ostial WT and ablation lesion impedance drop.
PV reconnection was associated with thicker LA and PV ostial WT. Future studies will examine whether targeting thicker PV ostial tissue with more aggressive lesion metrics or different ablation technology can improve PV isolation and ablationoutcomes.
肺静脉(PV)隔离是房颤(AF)射频(RF)消融的基石,而PV重新连接是房颤复发的常见原因。PV开口处壁厚(WT)与持久PV隔离之间的关系是一个正在研究的问题。此外,导管阻抗与WT之间的关系尚不清楚。我们研究了PV开口处WT、消融损伤指标与PV重新连接之间的关系。
确定16例接受初次和再次AF消融手术的患者,并在初次消融前使用ADAS-3D成像软件对其心脏CTA进行分析。从电解剖标测软件中收集初次消融手术的消融损伤指标。根据再次AF消融手术时收集的电解剖标测数据确定重新连接和隔离的PV。PV重新连接的患者左心房壁更厚(1.4毫米对1.2毫米,P<0.05),重新连接的静脉开口处壁更厚(1.7毫米对1.5毫米,P<0.05)。重新连接和隔离的PV之间的左心房容积、消融损伤数量和消融损伤时间无显著差异。与隔离PV的患者相比,重新连接PV的患者消融期间的阻抗下降更大(-9.0Ω对-6.6Ω,P<0.05)。PV开口处WT与消融损伤阻抗下降之间无相关性。
PV重新连接与更厚的左心房和PV开口处WT相关。未来的研究将探讨采用更积极的损伤指标或不同的消融技术针对更厚的PV开口处组织是否能改善PV隔离和消融效果。