Mao Lei, Li Mengzhen, Wu Linnan, Wang Juan, Que Yi, Sun Feifei, Huang Junting, Lu Suying, Zhen Zijun, Zhu Jia, Song Mengjia, Zhang Yizhuo
Department of Pediatric Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Front Immunol. 2025 Jun 6;16:1608844. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1608844. eCollection 2025.
Programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) inhibitors have shown durable response and mild adverse events in adult malignancies. However, study on PD-1 inhibitors in pediatric patients remains limited, and a direct comparison of distinct PD-1 inhibitors in pediatric tumors is lacking.
We conducted a retrospective analysis of 75 pediatric patients with advanced or recurrent malignancies treated with either Sintilimab-based (n=53) or Pembrolizumab-based (n=22) regimens. The primary endpoints included treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and objective response rate (ORR), and the second endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
The incidence of hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, pneumonia, increased ALT/AST, gastroenteritis, and rash following immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy showed no significant differences between the Sintilimab group and the Pembrolizumab group (all P>0.05). Cardiovascular Adverse Events (CVAEs) occurred in 26.0% (15/53) of Sintilimab-treated patients versus 40.0% (8/20) of Pembrolizumab-treated patients (P=0.26). In the lymphoma cohort (n=13), 88.9% of Sintilimab-treated patients and 75.0% of Pembrolizumab-treated patients achieved complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) (P=0.54). The median PFS and OS were not reached in either group. In the non-lymphoma cohort (n=53), 40.5% of Sintilimab-treated patients and 25.0% of Pembrolizumab-treated patients achieved CR or PR (P=0.18). Among 39 patients who had received ≤ 2 prior treatment lines, the PFS and OS showed no significant differences between the Sintilimab (n=30) and Pembrolizumab (n=9) groups (P=0.28 and P=0.09, respectively). Similarly, among 14 patients who had received>2 prior treatment lines, no significant differences in PFS and OS were observed between the Sintilimab(n=7) and Pembrolizumab(n=7) groups (P=0.33 and P=0.15, respectively).
Sintilimab demonstrated favorable tolerability and efficacy in pediatric patients with malignancies, with a safety and efficacy profile comparable to Pembrolizumab. For pediatric patients with advanced or recurrent malignancies receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, long-term monitoring of thyroid and cardiac function is recommended.
程序性死亡受体1(PD-1)抑制剂在成人恶性肿瘤中显示出持久的疗效和轻微的不良事件。然而,关于PD-1抑制剂在儿科患者中的研究仍然有限,并且缺乏对儿科肿瘤中不同PD-1抑制剂的直接比较。
我们对75例接受基于信迪利单抗(n=53)或帕博利珠单抗(n=22)方案治疗的晚期或复发性恶性肿瘤儿科患者进行了回顾性分析。主要终点包括治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)和客观缓解率(ORR),次要终点包括无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。
免疫检查点抑制剂治疗后甲状腺功能减退、甲状腺功能亢进、肺炎、谷丙转氨酶/谷草转氨酶升高、肠胃炎和皮疹的发生率在信迪利单抗组和帕博利珠单抗组之间无显著差异(所有P>0.05)。信迪利单抗治疗的患者中有26.0%(15/53)发生心血管不良事件(CVAEs),而帕博利珠单抗治疗的患者中有40.0%(8/20)发生(P=0.26)。在淋巴瘤队列(n=13)中,信迪利单抗治疗的患者中有88.9%、帕博利珠单抗治疗的患者中有75.0%达到完全缓解(CR)或部分缓解(PR)(P=0.54)。两组均未达到中位PFS和OS。在非淋巴瘤队列(n=53)中,信迪利单抗治疗的患者中有40.5%、帕博利珠单抗治疗的患者中有25.0%达到CR或PR(P=0.18)。在39例接受≤2线既往治疗的患者中,信迪利单抗组(n=30)和帕博利珠单抗组(n=9)的PFS和OS无显著差异(分别为P=0.28和P=0.09)。同样,在14例接受>2线既往治疗的患者中,信迪利单抗组(n=7)和帕博利珠单抗组(n=7)的PFS和OS也无显著差异(分别为P=0.33和P=0.15)。
信迪利单抗在患有恶性肿瘤的儿科患者中显示出良好的耐受性和疗效,其安全性和疗效与帕博利珠单抗相当。对于接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的晚期或复发性恶性肿瘤儿科患者,建议长期监测甲状腺和心脏功能。