Sandoval Elena, Pereda Daniel
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.
Center for Congenital Heart Disease, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain.
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 May 31;14(3):218-224. doi: 10.21037/acs-2025-ravr-0003. Epub 2025 May 29.
The natural history of aortic valve disease commonly eventuates in percutaneous or open surgical treatment. Percutaneous treatment has been expanding its indication from high-risk patients to low- and moderate-risk patients; however, there are certain groups of patients who are not good candidates for percutaneous treatment, such as those with bicuspid valve disease or pure aortic regurgitation patients. Robotic surgery, as an evolution from traditional approaches, has been gradually expanding its indications in cardiac surgery. The use of a lateral approach, common to robotic mitral procedures, may become a valid alternative for several patients undergoing aortic valve procedures. The aim of the present study was to evaluate and discuss the characteristics, challenges and early results of a newly created robotic aortic valve replacement program.
This was a retrospective study analysing prospectively collected data of all patients who have undergone robotic aortic valve replacement (RAVR) in Hospital Clínic Barcelona from December 2021 to October 2024.
Since December 2021, 25 consecutive patients have undergone RAVR. Sixty-eight percent of the cohort were males and the median age was 66 years [interquartile range (IQR), 58.5-71.8 years]. Severe aortic stenosis was the predominant lesion in 76% of patients, and degenerative calcification was the aetiology in 52% of patients. Median cardiopulmonary bypass time was 129 minutes (IQR, 113-145.5 minutes) and median ischemic time was 91 minutes (IQR, 78-105 minutes). Three patients required a re-exploration for bleeding, which was performed through the same approach, and one patient suffered an ischemic cerebro-vascular accident (CVA) with complete recovery. Median intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay and hospital length of stay were 1 and 4 days, respectively.
Our initial experience shows that expanding a robotic program to include RAVR is feasible, safe, and can provide excellent clinical outcomes in selected patients.
主动脉瓣疾病的自然病程通常最终会采用经皮或开放手术治疗。经皮治疗的适应证已从高危患者扩大到低危和中危患者;然而,有某些患者群体不适合经皮治疗,例如患有二叶式瓣膜疾病的患者或单纯主动脉反流患者。机器人手术作为传统方法的演进,在心脏手术中的适应证一直在逐渐扩大。机器人二尖瓣手术常用的外侧入路,可能成为一些接受主动脉瓣手术患者的有效替代方法。本研究的目的是评估和讨论新创建的机器人主动脉瓣置换项目的特点、挑战和早期结果。
这是一项回顾性研究,分析了2021年12月至2024年10月在巴塞罗那临床医院接受机器人主动脉瓣置换(RAVR)的所有患者的前瞻性收集数据。
自2021年12月以来,连续25例患者接受了RAVR。队列中68%为男性,中位年龄为66岁[四分位间距(IQR),58.5 - 71.8岁]。76%的患者主要病变为重度主动脉瓣狭窄,52%的患者病因是退行性钙化。中位体外循环时间为129分钟(IQR,113 - 145.5分钟),中位缺血时间为91分钟(IQR,78 - 105分钟)。3例患者因出血需要再次开胸探查,通过相同入路进行,1例患者发生缺血性脑血管意外(CVA),但完全康复。重症监护病房(ICU)中位住院时间和住院总时间分别为1天和4天。
我们的初步经验表明,将机器人手术项目扩展至包括RAVR是可行、安全的,并且可以为选定患者提供优异的临床结果。