Suppr超能文献

帕金森病中的α-突触核蛋白种子扩增检测:系统评价与网状Meta分析

Alpha-Synuclein Seed Amplification Assays in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Rissardo Jamir Pitton, Fornari Caprara Ana Leticia

机构信息

Neurology Department, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ 08103, USA.

出版信息

Clin Pract. 2025 Jun 3;15(6):107. doi: 10.3390/clinpract15060107.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

Assessment of α-synuclein (αSyn) seed amplification assays (αSyn-SAA) accuracy in distinguishing Parkinson's disease (PD) from controls using cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), blood, skin, extracellular vesicles (ECV), saliva, olfactory mucosa (OM), gastrointestinal tract (GIT), and submandibular gland (SMG).

METHODOLOGY

PubMed was searched for articles from 2010 to January 2025. The quality assessment used robvis. Diagnostic values with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were obtained. Z-test, Wald CI, and ANOVA were performed. Diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was used.

RESULTS

αSyn-SAAs showed strong diagnostic performance in distinguishing PD from controls across various tissue and fluid types. Overall, αSyn-SAAs demonstrated high sensitivity (86%) and specificity (92%). Among all biomatrices, CSF, skin, blood, and ECV yielded the highest diagnostic accuracy, with sensitivity and specificity approaching or exceeding 90%. In contrast, saliva, oral mucosa, and gastrointestinal tract samples showed more modest sensitivity, though specificity remained relatively high. ECV, CSF, skin, and blood matrices also demonstrated the highest DOR, supporting their potential clinical utility.

CONCLUSIONS

ECV and blood warrant priority in αSyn-SAA for high accuracy and minimal invasiveness, while GIT, OM, and oral samples show limited utility; saliva and SMG need refinement.

摘要

引言与目的

评估α-突触核蛋白(αSyn)种子扩增检测(αSyn-SAA)在使用脑脊液(CSF)、血液、皮肤、细胞外囊泡(ECV)、唾液、嗅黏膜(OM)、胃肠道(GIT)和下颌下腺(SMG)区分帕金森病(PD)与对照方面的准确性。

方法

检索PubMed中2010年至2025年1月的文章。采用robvis进行质量评估。获得具有95%置信区间(CI)的诊断值。进行Z检验、Wald CI和方差分析。使用诊断比值比(DOR)。

结果

αSyn-SAA在区分各种组织和液体类型的PD与对照方面表现出强大的诊断性能。总体而言,αSyn-SAA表现出高敏感性(86%)和特异性(92%)。在所有生物基质中,CSF、皮肤、血液和ECV的诊断准确性最高,敏感性和特异性接近或超过90%。相比之下,唾液、口腔黏膜和胃肠道样本的敏感性较低,尽管特异性仍然相对较高。ECV、CSF、皮肤和血液基质也表现出最高的DOR,支持它们的潜在临床应用价值。

结论

对于αSyn-SAA,ECV和血液因其高准确性和最小侵入性而值得优先考虑,而GIT、OM和口腔样本的应用有限;唾液和SMG需要改进。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a71/12192484/7a8f74cecf65/clinpract-15-00107-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验