Negru Paul Andrei, Tit Delia Mirela, Radu Andrei Flavius, Bungau Gabriela, Corb Aron Raluca Anca, Marin Ruxandra Cristina
Doctoral School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania.
Department of Preclinical Disciplines, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 410073 Oradea, Romania.
Biomedicines. 2025 Jun 5;13(6):1387. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13061387.
: During the COVID-19 pandemic, several antivirals were approved or repurposed, but their safety profiles have not been fully compared. Pharmacovigilance data help clarify how these drugs perform in real-world use. : This study performed a comparative pharmacovigilance analysis of eight antivirals used or tested during the COVID-19 pandemic, based on individual case safety reports (ICSRs) retrieved from the EudraVigilance database, reported up to 9 February 2025 and extracted from the official platform on 12 February 2025. Adverse reactions were assessed by system organ class (SOC), demographic patterns, and seriousness, and disproportionality analysis (reporting odds ratio (ROR)) was conducted to identify potential safety signals. : A total of 64,776 ICSRs were analyzed. Among approved antivirals, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NTV/r) accounted for 13.4% ( = 8693) of reports, while remdesivir (RDV) represented 6.3% ( = 4105). Repurposed antivirals such as ribavirin and lopinavir/ritonavir dominated the dataset, together making up over 80% ( = 51,978) of all reports. RDV was associated with a high proportion of serious adverse events (84%, = 3448), and showed consistent ROR signals in hepatobiliary, renal, cardiac, and general disorders, with values exceeding 2 in several comparisons. NTV/r displayed a milder overall profile, but with positive RORs for psychiatric disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, and product-related issues. The most affected SOCs across all drugs included general disorders (31.6%, = 20,493), gastrointestinal (19.5%, = 12,625), nervous system (17.8%, = 11,511), and investigations (20.4%, = 13,219). Demographic analysis showed that most events occurred in adults aged 18-64, with RDV more often reported in elderly patients and NTV/r more frequently associated with reports from female patients and non-healthcare reporters. : This study highlights distinct pharmacovigilance profiles of COVID-19 antivirals and supports the role of real-world data in guiding safer therapeutic choices.
在新冠疫情期间,多种抗病毒药物获批上市或获批用于其他适应症,但它们的安全性尚未得到充分比较。药物警戒数据有助于厘清这些药物在实际使用中的表现。本研究基于从EudraVigilance数据库检索到的个体病例安全报告(ICSR),对新冠疫情期间使用或测试的8种抗病毒药物进行了比较药物警戒分析。这些报告截至2025年2月9日上报,并于2025年2月12日从官方平台提取。通过系统器官分类(SOC)、人口统计学模式和严重程度评估不良反应,并进行不成比例分析(报告比值比(ROR))以识别潜在的安全信号。共分析了64776份ICSR。在获批的抗病毒药物中,奈玛特韦/利托那韦(NTV/r)占报告的13.4%(n = 8693),而瑞德西韦(RDV)占6.3%(n = 4105)。利巴韦林和洛匹那韦/利托那韦等重新利用的抗病毒药物在数据集中占主导地位,占所有报告的80%以上(n = 51978)。RDV与高比例的严重不良事件相关(84%,n = 3448),并且在肝胆、肾脏、心脏和全身性疾病中显示出一致的ROR信号,在几次比较中数值超过2。NTV/r总体情况较为温和,但在精神疾病、胃肠道疾病和与产品相关的问题上有阳性ROR。所有药物中受影响最大的SOC包括全身性疾病(31.6%,n = 20493)、胃肠道疾病(19.5%,n = 12625)、神经系统疾病(17.8%,n = 11511)和检查(20.4%,n = 13219)。人口统计学分析表明,大多数事件发生在18 - 64岁的成年人中,RDV在老年患者中报告更频繁,而NTV/r更常与女性患者和非医护人员的报告相关。本研究突出了新冠抗病毒药物不同的药物警戒特征,并支持真实世界数据在指导更安全治疗选择方面的作用。