Desai Shyam A, Burke Harold W, Adaralegbe Adejuyigbe O, Sweet Jennifer A, Hayek Salim M, Staudt Michael D
Division of Pain Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Division of Pain Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA; Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Neuromodulation. 2025 Jun 28. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2025.05.007.
Neuropathic craniofacial pain syndromes are heterogeneous with regards to clinical presentation and etiology. As such, they pose a diagnostic and management challenge, and are often refractory to medical and interventional management. High cervical intrathecal drug delivery has been reported in the management of refractory cancer-related craniofacial pain, although the literature regarding its use in neuropathic craniofacial pain remains limited. This study aims to describe the successful management of a series of patients with refractory neuropathic craniofacial pain who underwent implantation of a high cervical intrathecal drug delivery system (IDDS).
A single-center retrospective chart review was conducted in patients with refractory non-cancer neuropathic craniofacial pain who underwent implantation of an IDDS with the intrathecal catheter tip placed at a high cervical level. A variety of medical, interventional, and neuromodulation modalities had failed in these patients. Data collection spanned 2016 through March 2025. Medical charts were reviewed for demographic data, operative details, pain severity outcomes, intrathecal medication dosing, and the incidence of complications.
Overall, 12 patients (ten women, two men) underwent a high cervical intrathecal catheter trial. Nine patients had successful trials with reported improvement in pain >50%, with no significant reported side effects to a combination of fentanyl/bupivacaine. All patients suffered from neuropathic pain in the trigeminal distribution, with three patients experiencing corneal neuropathy. Patients were observed for a mean of 64.8 ± 48.1 months. Pain severity was significantly lower at last follow-up than at baseline (numeric rating scale of 9.5 ± 0.9 vs 4.3 ± 2.3) (p < 0.01). Three patients required catheter revision owing to migration. No patients were explanted for loss of efficacy.
High cervical intrathecal drug delivery can be an effective treatment option for patients with refractory neuropathic craniofacial pain, even in patients presenting with heterogeneous pain of differing etiologies and failure with other treatments.
神经性颅面疼痛综合征在临床表现和病因方面具有异质性。因此,它们带来了诊断和管理方面的挑战,并且通常对药物和介入治疗具有难治性。尽管关于高颈段鞘内药物输注在神经性颅面疼痛中的应用的文献仍然有限,但已有报道称其可用于治疗难治性癌症相关颅面疼痛。本研究旨在描述一系列难治性神经性颅面疼痛患者在接受高颈段鞘内药物输送系统(IDDS)植入后的成功治疗情况。
对难治性非癌性神经性颅面疼痛患者进行了一项单中心回顾性病历审查,这些患者接受了鞘内导管尖端置于高颈段水平的IDDS植入。这些患者尝试了多种药物、介入和神经调节方式均失败。数据收集时间跨度为2016年至2025年3月。对病历进行审查,以获取人口统计学数据、手术细节、疼痛严重程度结果、鞘内药物剂量以及并发症发生率。
总体而言,12例患者(10名女性,2名男性)接受了高颈段鞘内导管试验。9例患者试验成功,报告疼痛改善>50%,对芬太尼/布比卡因联合用药未报告明显副作用。所有患者均患有三叉神经分布区的神经性疼痛,3例患者出现角膜神经病变。患者平均观察时间为64.8±48.1个月。末次随访时的疼痛严重程度显著低于基线水平(数字评分量表分别为9.5±0.9和4.3±2.3)(p<0.01)。3例患者因导管移位需要进行导管修复。没有患者因疗效丧失而取出装置。
高颈段鞘内药物输注对于难治性神经性颅面疼痛患者可能是一种有效的治疗选择,即使是病因不同且疼痛表现异质性以及其他治疗失败的患者。