Moesker Karen, Wiarda Martijn
Department of Values, Technology and Innovation, Delft University of Technology, Jaffalaan 5, Delft, 2628 BX, The Netherlands.
Department of Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences, Eindhoven University of Technology, Group Technology, Innovation & Society, Het Eeuwsel 53, Eindhoven, 3600 MB, The Netherlands.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2025 Jul 1;31(4):18. doi: 10.1007/s11948-025-00542-3.
As global water scarcity worsens, potable water reuse is increasingly considered a vital solution for augmenting water supplies. However, public acceptance remains a significant barrier, presumably because of a misalignment between the public values reflected by these systems and those that are held by the communities that these systems intend to serve. This study explores this potential misalignment by systematically identifying and analysing the most prevalent values inscribed in academic research on potable water reuse. We employ a mixed-methods approach, combining probabilistic topic modelling with thematic analysis of 2940 academic publications to identify and conceptualise latent values discussed in the literature. Our findings suggest that the values 'reliability', 'sustainability', 'health', and 'safety' are most prevalent but that their conceptualisation remains largely ambivalent. For example, sustainability exhibits an ambivalent relationship with safety, sometimes conflicting and sometimes supporting, depending on the research perspective. Crucially, this research demonstrates a predominantly technocentric understanding of these values. While this technical focus is undeniably important, it also risks overlooking broader societal concerns and other value interpretations. This research highlights the need for a more value-sensitive approach to ensure a more responsible potable water reuse, incorporating a wider range of public values to promote the system's social and ethical desirability.
随着全球水资源短缺问题日益严重,饮用水再利用越来越被视为增加供水的关键解决方案。然而,公众接受度仍然是一个重大障碍,这可能是因为这些系统所反映的公共价值观与它们打算服务的社区所持有的价值观不一致。本研究通过系统地识别和分析饮用水再利用学术研究中最普遍的价值观,探讨了这种潜在的不一致。我们采用混合方法,将概率主题建模与对2940篇学术出版物的主题分析相结合,以识别和概念化文献中讨论的潜在价值观。我们的研究结果表明,“可靠性”“可持续性”“健康”和“安全”等价值观最为普遍,但它们的概念化在很大程度上仍模棱两可。例如,可持续性与安全呈现出一种矛盾的关系,有时相互冲突,有时相互支持,这取决于研究视角。至关重要的是,这项研究表明对这些价值观的理解主要是以技术为中心的。虽然这种技术重点无疑很重要,但它也有忽视更广泛的社会关切和其他价值解释的风险。本研究强调需要一种更注重价值的方法,以确保更负责任的饮用水再利用,纳入更广泛的公共价值观,以提高该系统的社会和伦理合意性。